On the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility in International Law

{"title":"On the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility in International Law","authors":"","doi":"10.34076/2410-2709-2019-1-65-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to direct participation of children in hostilities and the possibility of committing war crimes by children it is necessary to address the issue of the criminal responsibility of the child in international law. One of the key aspects is the minimum age of such responsibility. The aim of the article is to study whether children might be prosecuted by international or internationalized criminal courts. To achieve this goal, the author applied both general scientific (analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction) and private methods (formal legal, comparative legal and historical legal).\nAnalysis of international treaties, travaux préparatoires and the case law of international and hybrid criminal courts leads to the following conclusions. The majority of international treaties either do not contain a special rule on the minimum age of criminal responsibility or set out framework provisions. There are certain grounds for recognizing 15 years as the minimum age of criminal responsibility in international law. At the same time, due to various circumstances (in particular, the «straight 18» policy, exclusion from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court for persons under 18), the prospects for international legal regulation of these relations are difficult to predict.","PeriodicalId":248707,"journal":{"name":"Rossijskoe Pravo. Obrazovanie, Praktika, Nauka","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossijskoe Pravo. Obrazovanie, Praktika, Nauka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34076/2410-2709-2019-1-65-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to direct participation of children in hostilities and the possibility of committing war crimes by children it is necessary to address the issue of the criminal responsibility of the child in international law. One of the key aspects is the minimum age of such responsibility. The aim of the article is to study whether children might be prosecuted by international or internationalized criminal courts. To achieve this goal, the author applied both general scientific (analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction) and private methods (formal legal, comparative legal and historical legal). Analysis of international treaties, travaux préparatoires and the case law of international and hybrid criminal courts leads to the following conclusions. The majority of international treaties either do not contain a special rule on the minimum age of criminal responsibility or set out framework provisions. There are certain grounds for recognizing 15 years as the minimum age of criminal responsibility in international law. At the same time, due to various circumstances (in particular, the «straight 18» policy, exclusion from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court for persons under 18), the prospects for international legal regulation of these relations are difficult to predict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论国际法上的最低刑事责任年龄
由于儿童直接参与敌对行动以及儿童犯下战争罪的可能性,有必要在国际法中处理儿童的刑事责任问题。其中一个关键方面是承担这种责任的最低年龄。本文的目的是研究儿童是否可以被国际或国际化的刑事法院起诉。为了实现这一目标,作者既运用了一般的科学方法(分析与综合、演绎与归纳),也运用了私人方法(形式法、比较法和历史法)。对国际条约、刑事诉讼法以及国际刑事法院和混合刑事法院的判例法的分析得出以下结论。大多数国际条约要么不载有关于最低刑事责任年龄的特别规则,要么列出框架性规定。在国际法上承认15岁为最低刑事责任年龄是有一定理由的。与此同时,由于各种情况(特别是“直18”政策,将18岁以下的人排除在国际刑事法院的管辖范围之外),这些关系的国际法律调节的前景难以预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Admission of a Notary to Entrepreneurs in Custody: Problems of Implementation Peculiarities of Realization and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms on the Internet: a Problem Statement Why Do Lawyers Need Legal Anthropology? On the Modern Problems of Representation Used in the Implementation of the Supervisory Function of the Prosecutor’s Of ce The Concept of Rumors, Their Collection and Use in Investigating Crimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1