What’s New in European Property Law?

C. Rupp
{"title":"What’s New in European Property Law?","authors":"C. Rupp","doi":"10.1515/eplj-2019-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following up on the first instalment of what will hopefully evolve into a long and fruitful series, this article intends to present an overview of contributions to the field of European property law published in 2017 and 2018. Once again, the aim is not to provide an in-depth critical review of individual works, but to offer a panoramic view of recent publications. This necessitates a somewhat general approach, allowing for only short descriptions and outlines of the books and articles presented. Grouped by subject matter, the brief remarks on each work are intended to give the reader a first orientation regarding current issues and debates, and to invite further exploration. Two remarkable trends emerge from the bird’s-eye view of recent publications. Firstly, property law – often considered a static and staid discipline – seems to be undergoing a “rejuvenating cure”. This is evident on the personnel level: a remarkable number of contributions come from young scholars at the outset of their careers as property law is an increasingly popular area for PhD and postgraduate dissertations. But it also holds true in terms of content: fresh angles, methods and approaches are brought to bear both on questions of traditional property law dogmatics and on new challenges. Secondly, the boundaries of property law are continuously opening up, going beyond the classic “law of things” to branch out into neighbouring disciplines while incorporating practice-oriented approaches and inter-disciplinary connections into dogmatic property law research. As many of the newly arising challenges to property law are of global importance, purely national angles of research are increasingly replaced by encompassing internationality.","PeriodicalId":338086,"journal":{"name":"European Property Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Property Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2019-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following up on the first instalment of what will hopefully evolve into a long and fruitful series, this article intends to present an overview of contributions to the field of European property law published in 2017 and 2018. Once again, the aim is not to provide an in-depth critical review of individual works, but to offer a panoramic view of recent publications. This necessitates a somewhat general approach, allowing for only short descriptions and outlines of the books and articles presented. Grouped by subject matter, the brief remarks on each work are intended to give the reader a first orientation regarding current issues and debates, and to invite further exploration. Two remarkable trends emerge from the bird’s-eye view of recent publications. Firstly, property law – often considered a static and staid discipline – seems to be undergoing a “rejuvenating cure”. This is evident on the personnel level: a remarkable number of contributions come from young scholars at the outset of their careers as property law is an increasingly popular area for PhD and postgraduate dissertations. But it also holds true in terms of content: fresh angles, methods and approaches are brought to bear both on questions of traditional property law dogmatics and on new challenges. Secondly, the boundaries of property law are continuously opening up, going beyond the classic “law of things” to branch out into neighbouring disciplines while incorporating practice-oriented approaches and inter-disciplinary connections into dogmatic property law research. As many of the newly arising challenges to property law are of global importance, purely national angles of research are increasingly replaced by encompassing internationality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲物权法有何新动向?
继第一部分之后,本文打算概述2017年和2018年发表的对欧洲物权法领域的贡献,该系列有望发展成为一个漫长而富有成果的系列。再一次,我们的目的不是提供对个别作品的深入评论,而是提供对最近出版物的全景视图。这需要一种比较通用的方法,只允许对所提供的书籍和文章进行简短的描述和概述。按主题分组,对每项工作的简短评论旨在给读者一个关于当前问题和辩论的第一个方向,并邀请进一步的探索。从最近出版物的鸟瞰图中可以看出两个显著的趋势。首先,物权法——通常被认为是一门静态和古板的学科——似乎正在经历一场“恢复活力的治疗”。这在人员层面上表现得很明显:由于财产法是博士和研究生论文越来越受欢迎的领域,许多年轻学者在职业生涯之初就做出了显著的贡献。但在内容方面也是如此:它带来了新的角度、方法和途径,以应对传统物权法教条主义的问题和新的挑战。其次,物权法的边界不断开放,超越经典的“物之法”,向相邻学科延伸,同时将实践导向和跨学科联系融入到教条式的物权法研究中。由于许多新出现的物权法挑战具有全球性的重要性,纯粹的国家角度的研究日益被涵盖的国际性所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial – Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Spain Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in Sweden Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings in the Netherlands Obligations for Owners to Climate-Proof Buildings: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1