{"title":"Features of Solving Plots in Temple Painting by the Founders of the Religious-national Trend and Artists of the Circle of M. M. Vasiliev","authors":"Vera Sergeevna Feshchenko","doi":"10.7256/2454-0625.2022.11.39259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The subject of the study is to identify the peculiarities in solving the plots of church painting of individual representatives of the religious-national trend of the turn of the XIX - XX centuries. The purpose is to show the development of national trends of Russian monumental church art by the founders of the religious-national trend on the examples of the work of V. M.Vasnetsov, M. V. Nesterov, M.A. Vrubel and artists M. M. Vasiliev, A. P. Blaznov, L. A. Pyanovsky, K. S. Petrov-Vodkin, F. R. Raylian, to identify similarities and differences in the manner and in the transmission of images and compositions, as well as to substantiate the significance of these differences for art history. The basis of art criticism research is the formal stylistic method of G. Velflin, the iconographic method of N. P. Kondakov, the iconological method of E. Panofsky; the method of phenomenological analysis of the aesthetic perception of the artistic work of V. V. Bychkov and G. K. Wagner. Comparative analysis of murals by artists M. M. Vasiliev, A. P. Blaznov, L. A. Pyanovsky, F. R. Raylian, K. S. Petrov-Vodkin in comparison with the work of representatives of the \"Vasnetsov school\" allowed us to see the development of the national style in art, from an abstract-figurative understanding to a conscious spiritual-symbolic interpretation of church painting of the Middle Ages and pre-Petrine Russia as an integral artistic phenomenon of the religious-national trend. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that the example of the artists of the \"Vasiliev circle\" revealed a kind of overcoming of one of the main problems of the iconographic image, which consists in maintaining a delicate balance of life-likeness and ideality. In their works, in the context of interpretation, the measure of realism of the image is traced, in which the spiritual content can be embodied in a material form without losing its sacred content, which is a valuable example for modern artists who set themselves the task of creating images without copying, but remaining in the canon.\n","PeriodicalId":184304,"journal":{"name":"Культура и искусство","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Культура и искусство","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2022.11.39259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The subject of the study is to identify the peculiarities in solving the plots of church painting of individual representatives of the religious-national trend of the turn of the XIX - XX centuries. The purpose is to show the development of national trends of Russian monumental church art by the founders of the religious-national trend on the examples of the work of V. M.Vasnetsov, M. V. Nesterov, M.A. Vrubel and artists M. M. Vasiliev, A. P. Blaznov, L. A. Pyanovsky, K. S. Petrov-Vodkin, F. R. Raylian, to identify similarities and differences in the manner and in the transmission of images and compositions, as well as to substantiate the significance of these differences for art history. The basis of art criticism research is the formal stylistic method of G. Velflin, the iconographic method of N. P. Kondakov, the iconological method of E. Panofsky; the method of phenomenological analysis of the aesthetic perception of the artistic work of V. V. Bychkov and G. K. Wagner. Comparative analysis of murals by artists M. M. Vasiliev, A. P. Blaznov, L. A. Pyanovsky, F. R. Raylian, K. S. Petrov-Vodkin in comparison with the work of representatives of the "Vasnetsov school" allowed us to see the development of the national style in art, from an abstract-figurative understanding to a conscious spiritual-symbolic interpretation of church painting of the Middle Ages and pre-Petrine Russia as an integral artistic phenomenon of the religious-national trend. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that the example of the artists of the "Vasiliev circle" revealed a kind of overcoming of one of the main problems of the iconographic image, which consists in maintaining a delicate balance of life-likeness and ideality. In their works, in the context of interpretation, the measure of realism of the image is traced, in which the spiritual content can be embodied in a material form without losing its sacred content, which is a valuable example for modern artists who set themselves the task of creating images without copying, but remaining in the canon.
本研究的主题是找出十九至二十世纪之交宗教民族倾向的个人代表在解决教堂绘画情节方面的特点。目的是展示国家的发展趋势的俄罗斯的教堂艺术的创始人religious-national趋势诉M.Vasnetsov工作的例子,m . v . Nesterov硕士Vrubel和艺术家m·m·瓦西里耶夫a . p . Blaznov l . a . Pyanovsky k . s . Petrov-Vodkin f·r·Raylian识别相似和不同的方式和图片和作品的传播,以及证实这些差异对艺术历史的重要性。艺术批评研究的基础是维尔弗林的形式风格方法、康达科夫的图像学方法、帕诺夫斯基的图像学方法;用现象学方法分析比奇科夫和瓦格纳艺术作品的美感。比较分析的壁画艺术家m·m·瓦西里耶夫a . p . Blaznov l . a . Pyanovsky f·r·Raylian k . s . Petrov-Vodkin相比,“Vasnetsov学校”代表的工作让我们看到艺术的民族风格的发展,从一个abstract-figurative理解意识spiritual-symbolic中世纪教堂画的解释和pre-Petrine俄罗斯作为一个整体的艺术现象religious-national趋势。研究的现实意义在于,“瓦西里耶夫圈”艺术家的例子揭示了一种对肖像图像的主要问题之一的克服,即保持生活化与理想化的微妙平衡。在他们的作品中,在阐释的语境中,追溯了形象的现实主义的尺度,其中精神内容可以体现在物质形式中而不失去其神圣的内容,这对现代艺术家来说是一个有价值的例子,他们为自己设定了创造图像的任务,而不是复制,而是保持在经典中。