Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Different Curing Methods

D. Y. Osei, Z. Mustapha, Mohammed D.H. Zebilila
{"title":"Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Different Curing Methods","authors":"D. Y. Osei, Z. Mustapha, Mohammed D.H. Zebilila","doi":"10.22610/jsds.v10i3(s).2983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The structural use of concrete depends largely on its strength, especially compressive strength.Various tests were carried out to ascertain the properties of concrete materials, whereas test performances ofthe concrete with different mix ratios at specific ages of curing were undertaken. The study determined thecompressive strength of concrete using different curing methods. Four different methods of curing (ponding,continuous wetting, open-air curing and sprinkling with water) were used. Seventy-two (72) cubes were castusing a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and 1:3:6 with 0.5 water cement ratio and with 0.6 waters cement ratio respectively.The compressive strengths were determined after 7 days, 14 days and at 28 days of curing. Findings showthat for 1:2:4 concrete, maximum of 28-day compressive was the highest for concrete cured by ponding andthe least was by sprinkling water. Further findings show that for 1:3:6 concrete, maximum of 28-daycompressive strength was obtained using ponding and the least was open air curing. Despite ponding methodproducing the highest compressive strength of concrete, it is practically impossible to cure cubes aboveground structural elements. Wet-covering method is recommended for structural elements, such as columns,beams and slabs in other to produce concreteof a required compressive strength.","PeriodicalId":297443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Development Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Development Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v10i3(s).2983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The structural use of concrete depends largely on its strength, especially compressive strength.Various tests were carried out to ascertain the properties of concrete materials, whereas test performances ofthe concrete with different mix ratios at specific ages of curing were undertaken. The study determined thecompressive strength of concrete using different curing methods. Four different methods of curing (ponding,continuous wetting, open-air curing and sprinkling with water) were used. Seventy-two (72) cubes were castusing a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and 1:3:6 with 0.5 water cement ratio and with 0.6 waters cement ratio respectively.The compressive strengths were determined after 7 days, 14 days and at 28 days of curing. Findings showthat for 1:2:4 concrete, maximum of 28-day compressive was the highest for concrete cured by ponding andthe least was by sprinkling water. Further findings show that for 1:3:6 concrete, maximum of 28-daycompressive strength was obtained using ponding and the least was open air curing. Despite ponding methodproducing the highest compressive strength of concrete, it is practically impossible to cure cubes aboveground structural elements. Wet-covering method is recommended for structural elements, such as columns,beams and slabs in other to produce concreteof a required compressive strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同养护方法下混凝土的抗压强度
混凝土的结构用途在很大程度上取决于它的强度,特别是抗压强度。为了确定混凝土材料的性能,进行了各种试验,并对不同配合比的混凝土在特定养护龄期的性能进行了试验。采用不同的养护方法测定了混凝土的抗压强度。采用了四种不同的养护方法(池养护、连续湿润养护、露天养护和洒水养护)。将72个立方体分别以1:2:4和1:3:6的混合比,0.5水灰比和0.6水灰比进行浇筑。分别在养护第7天、第14天和第28天测定抗压强度。结果表明:对于1:2:4的混凝土,浇筑养护混凝土28天最大抗压强度最高,洒水养护混凝土最小;进一步研究表明,对于1:3:6的混凝土,采用浇筑的28天抗压强度最大,露天养护的28天抗压强度最小。尽管水池法产生混凝土的最高抗压强度,但实际上不可能治愈地面上的立方体结构元件。建议对结构构件(如柱、梁和板)采用湿覆盖方法,以产生所需抗压强度的混凝土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Food Insecurity in Thailand during the Coronavirus Pandemic Host Community Attitudes Towards Internally Displaced Persons: Evidence from Al-Bab, Syria The Social Learning Theory and Gender Representations in Leadership Positions. A case of Health Sector in Tanzania Stateless Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh: Life and Livelihood Challenges The Factors Influencing Intergenerational Mobility Levels among Higher Education Graduates in Brazil: A Comparison of the Years 2004 and 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1