Historical Materialism: Does the Concept Have a Future?

L. Grinin, A. Grinin
{"title":"Historical Materialism: Does the Concept Have a Future?","authors":"L. Grinin, A. Grinin","doi":"10.30884/seh/2023.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines academic and intellectual merits of the central part of Marxism – historical materialism. The authors argue that historical materialism has many valuable findings and conclusions and analyze some of them, showing that they together with its methodology can be helpful for social scientist and for a historian theorizing and aspiring for wide analogues. There are given new explanations to this phenomenon as the restrictions are revealed of the existing model of historical materialism. A peculiar attention is paid to Marx's conclusion that the changing developmental level of productive forces inevitably leads to changes in all other spheres of societal life; moreover, these changes proceed far from automatically and immediately but through the resolution of structural and systemic crisis in a society. The article presents a survey on the history of the Western studies within historical material-ism framework starting from the end of the nineteenth century at the general background of the ups and downs of the Western Marxism and its crisis after the collapse of socialism. The authors show the waves of the Western Marxists' attenuating and increasing interest in historical materialism. The latter to a certain extent should be considered as a program for scientific research which is far from its realization. The authors make a conclusion that today one can hardly work within the framework of historical materialism conception since many of its postulates should be revised. It is very important, that historical materi-alism can affect social science mainly in an indirect way through a creative acquiring and interpretation of its method, approaches, and par-Social","PeriodicalId":354072,"journal":{"name":"Social Evolution & History","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Evolution & History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2023.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines academic and intellectual merits of the central part of Marxism – historical materialism. The authors argue that historical materialism has many valuable findings and conclusions and analyze some of them, showing that they together with its methodology can be helpful for social scientist and for a historian theorizing and aspiring for wide analogues. There are given new explanations to this phenomenon as the restrictions are revealed of the existing model of historical materialism. A peculiar attention is paid to Marx's conclusion that the changing developmental level of productive forces inevitably leads to changes in all other spheres of societal life; moreover, these changes proceed far from automatically and immediately but through the resolution of structural and systemic crisis in a society. The article presents a survey on the history of the Western studies within historical material-ism framework starting from the end of the nineteenth century at the general background of the ups and downs of the Western Marxism and its crisis after the collapse of socialism. The authors show the waves of the Western Marxists' attenuating and increasing interest in historical materialism. The latter to a certain extent should be considered as a program for scientific research which is far from its realization. The authors make a conclusion that today one can hardly work within the framework of historical materialism conception since many of its postulates should be revised. It is very important, that historical materi-alism can affect social science mainly in an indirect way through a creative acquiring and interpretation of its method, approaches, and par-Social
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史唯物主义:概念有未来吗?
本文考察了马克思主义的核心部分——历史唯物主义的学术价值和思想价值。作者认为,历史唯物主义有许多有价值的发现和结论,并分析了其中的一些,表明它们与它的方法论一起可以帮助社会科学家和历史学家理论化和渴望广泛的类似物。随着唯物史观的局限性的暴露,对这一现象有了新的解释。本书特别关注马克思的结论,即生产力发展水平的变化不可避免地导致社会生活所有其他领域的变化;此外,这些变化远不是自动和立即进行的,而是通过解决社会中的结构性和系统性危机来进行的。本文以西方马克思主义的兴衰起伏和社会主义崩溃后的危机为大背景,回顾了19世纪末以来唯物史观框架下的西方研究史。作者展示了西方马克思主义者对历史唯物主义兴趣的减弱和增强的浪潮。后者在一定程度上应该被认为是一项科学研究计划,但远未实现。作者的结论是,今天人们很难在历史唯物主义概念的框架内工作,因为它的许多假设需要修改。重要的是,历史唯物主义可以通过创造性地获取和解释其方法、途径和准社会,主要以间接的方式影响社会科学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Stratification, Genealogical Distance, and State Formation in Early Hawaii and the Central Andes: Steps, Slopes, and Off-Ramps in Social Evolution Demographic Transformations in the Historical Process in the Light of Technological Development: Theoretical Approach Demographic Transformations in the Light of Technological Development: Types of Demographic Reproduction in the Past and in the Future Polycentric Governance as a Practical Strategy for Balanced Policing: A Cross-Cultural Analysis A Five-Day Week in Rwanda in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century and in the Early Twentieth Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1