J. Becker, T. Bernhold, D. Beverungen, N. Kaling, R. Knackstedt, V. Lellek, H. Rauer
{"title":"Construction of Productivity Models - A Tool-Supported Approach in the Area of Facility Management","authors":"J. Becker, T. Bernhold, D. Beverungen, N. Kaling, R. Knackstedt, V. Lellek, H. Rauer","doi":"10.18417/emisa.7.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Productivity models specify input and output factors to inform productivity analyses. Current research and business practice face the challenge of developing a wide range of different productivity models. These models were created simultaneously but isolated from each other. As a consequence thereof, several practices of productivity model construction have emerged. This paper presents a unifying modelling language that lists and interrelates the essential constructs, pertinent to productivity models. Ultimately it was transferred into practice by employing a software tool. The application was conducted in the area of facility management, supporting two different approaches of productivity benchmarking. Facility management features a huge diversity of offered services and bundles. Thus, facility managers cope with various definitions of productivity that are then modelled with our approach.","PeriodicalId":186216,"journal":{"name":"Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model.","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.7.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Productivity models specify input and output factors to inform productivity analyses. Current research and business practice face the challenge of developing a wide range of different productivity models. These models were created simultaneously but isolated from each other. As a consequence thereof, several practices of productivity model construction have emerged. This paper presents a unifying modelling language that lists and interrelates the essential constructs, pertinent to productivity models. Ultimately it was transferred into practice by employing a software tool. The application was conducted in the area of facility management, supporting two different approaches of productivity benchmarking. Facility management features a huge diversity of offered services and bundles. Thus, facility managers cope with various definitions of productivity that are then modelled with our approach.