Yevgeny A. Boratynsky’s Philosophical Lyrics in the Perception of Vasily V. Zenkovsky and Semyon L. Frank

Yu.Yu. Anokhina
{"title":"Yevgeny A. Boratynsky’s Philosophical Lyrics in the Perception of Vasily V. Zenkovsky and Semyon L. Frank","authors":"Yu.Yu. Anokhina","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2022.4.118-132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A particular aspect of the problem of interference of philosophy and literature is considered. This article reflects the results of the ongoing study of the problem of perception of poetry by E.A. Boratynsky in Russian philosophical thought. For the first time, an analysis of the reception of Baratynsky's lyrics in the works of Archpriest V.V. Zenkovsky and S.L. Frank is presented. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that the stated problem is considered for the first time. The relevance seems to lie in the interdisciplinary nature of the research being undertaken. Appeal to the method of slow reading allows us to reconstruct two specific examples of the complex process of interaction between Russian literature and philosophy. Particular attention is paid to Zenkovsky's article “Philosophical Motives of Russian Poetry”, as well as Frank's abstracts “The Meaning of Suffering”, “On the Meaning of Suffering in Russian Literature” and his “Etudes on Pushkin”. It is shown that both Zenkovsky and Frank saw in Boratynsky, first of all, a contemporary of A.S. Pushkin, a poet-philosopher who expressed pessimistic ideas in his work. At the same time, unlike Zenkovsky, who tried to define the essence of Boratynsky's lyrics as such, Frank turned to the poet's poems in order to determine the place of Pushkin in Russian poetry and, on the other hand, in order to express the provisions of his own concept of suffering more clearly.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2022.4.118-132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A particular aspect of the problem of interference of philosophy and literature is considered. This article reflects the results of the ongoing study of the problem of perception of poetry by E.A. Boratynsky in Russian philosophical thought. For the first time, an analysis of the reception of Baratynsky's lyrics in the works of Archpriest V.V. Zenkovsky and S.L. Frank is presented. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that the stated problem is considered for the first time. The relevance seems to lie in the interdisciplinary nature of the research being undertaken. Appeal to the method of slow reading allows us to reconstruct two specific examples of the complex process of interaction between Russian literature and philosophy. Particular attention is paid to Zenkovsky's article “Philosophical Motives of Russian Poetry”, as well as Frank's abstracts “The Meaning of Suffering”, “On the Meaning of Suffering in Russian Literature” and his “Etudes on Pushkin”. It is shown that both Zenkovsky and Frank saw in Boratynsky, first of all, a contemporary of A.S. Pushkin, a poet-philosopher who expressed pessimistic ideas in his work. At the same time, unlike Zenkovsky, who tried to define the essence of Boratynsky's lyrics as such, Frank turned to the poet's poems in order to determine the place of Pushkin in Russian poetry and, on the other hand, in order to express the provisions of his own concept of suffering more clearly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在瓦西里·v·赞科夫斯基和谢米恩·l·弗兰克的感知中,叶夫根尼·a·博拉廷斯基的哲学歌词
本文考虑了哲学与文学干涉问题的一个特殊方面。本文反映了对俄国哲学思想中博拉廷斯基诗歌感知问题的研究成果。本文首次分析了巴拉廷斯基的歌词在大祭司V.V.曾科夫斯基和S.L.弗兰克的作品中的接受情况。这项研究的新颖之处在于它第一次考虑了上述问题。相关性似乎在于正在进行的研究的跨学科性质。借助慢读的方法,我们可以重构俄罗斯文学与哲学之间复杂互动过程的两个具体例子。特别值得注意的是曾科夫斯基的文章《俄罗斯诗歌的哲学动机》,以及弗兰克的摘要《苦难的意义》、《论俄罗斯文学中苦难的意义》和他的《普希金练习曲》。这表明,赞科夫斯基和弗兰克都认为博拉廷斯基首先是普希金的同代人,是一位在作品中表达悲观思想的诗人哲学家。与此同时,与曾科夫斯基试图定义博拉廷斯基歌词的本质不同,弗兰克转向诗人的诗歌,一方面是为了确定普希金在俄罗斯诗歌中的地位,另一方面是为了更清楚地表达他自己的苦难概念的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The First Edition of “The Justification of Good” (1897): Contemporaries’ Response. Part 4 The image of Philostratus in the works of K.K. Vaginov: experience of deconstruction “Real Deed of an Artist” and Philosophy of Art: Solovyev – Fyodorov – Chekrygin V.Y. Bryusov, N.F. Fedorov and the Fedorovians of the 1900s-1920s: The Question of Meaning and Goals of Art. Article one. What were Bryusov and Fedorov Arguing about in the House of Yu.P. Bartenev V.I. Lamansky. Historical letters on the attitude of Russian people to their tribesmen. The letter VI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1