Clarifying False Memories in Voice-based Search

Johannes Kiesel, Arefeh Bahrami, Benno Stein, Avishek Anand, Matthias Hagen
{"title":"Clarifying False Memories in Voice-based Search","authors":"Johannes Kiesel, Arefeh Bahrami, Benno Stein, Avishek Anand, Matthias Hagen","doi":"10.1145/3295750.3298961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Queries containing false memories (i.e., attributes the user misremembered about a searched item) represent a challenge for search systems. A query with a false memory will match inadequate results or even no result, and an automatic query correction is necessary to satisfy the user expectations. For voice-based search interfaces, which aim at a natural, dialog-based search experience, a sensible answer to this kind of unintentionally ill-posed queries is even more crucial. However, the usual solutions in display-based interfaces for queries without matches (e.g., suggesting to drop some query terms) cannot really be transferred to the voice-based setting. Based on the assumption that false memory queries could be identified---a research problem in its own right---, we present the first user study on how voice-based search systems may communicate the respective corrections to a user. Our study compares the user satisfaction in a voice-based search setting for three kinds of false memory clarifications and a baseline case where the system just answers \"I don't know.'' Our findings suggest that (1)~users are more satisfied when they receive a clarification that and how the system corrected a false memory, (2)~users even prefer failed correction attempts over no such attempt, and (3)~the tone of the clarification has to be considered for the best possible user satisfaction as well.","PeriodicalId":187771,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Queries containing false memories (i.e., attributes the user misremembered about a searched item) represent a challenge for search systems. A query with a false memory will match inadequate results or even no result, and an automatic query correction is necessary to satisfy the user expectations. For voice-based search interfaces, which aim at a natural, dialog-based search experience, a sensible answer to this kind of unintentionally ill-posed queries is even more crucial. However, the usual solutions in display-based interfaces for queries without matches (e.g., suggesting to drop some query terms) cannot really be transferred to the voice-based setting. Based on the assumption that false memory queries could be identified---a research problem in its own right---, we present the first user study on how voice-based search systems may communicate the respective corrections to a user. Our study compares the user satisfaction in a voice-based search setting for three kinds of false memory clarifications and a baseline case where the system just answers "I don't know.'' Our findings suggest that (1)~users are more satisfied when they receive a clarification that and how the system corrected a false memory, (2)~users even prefer failed correction attempts over no such attempt, and (3)~the tone of the clarification has to be considered for the best possible user satisfaction as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在语音搜索中澄清错误记忆
包含错误记忆的查询(例如,用户记错了搜索项的属性)对搜索系统来说是一个挑战。具有错误记忆的查询将匹配不充分的结果,甚至没有结果,并且需要自动查询更正以满足用户的期望。对于以自然的、基于对话的搜索体验为目标的基于语音的搜索界面来说,对这种无意中不恰当的查询的合理回答更为重要。然而,在基于显示的界面中,对于没有匹配的查询(例如,建议删除一些查询术语),通常的解决方案无法真正转移到基于语音的设置中。基于错误记忆查询可以被识别的假设——这本身就是一个研究问题——我们提出了关于基于语音的搜索系统如何将各自的更正传达给用户的第一个用户研究。我们的研究比较了三种错误记忆澄清的语音搜索设置和系统只回答“我不知道”的基线情况下的用户满意度。“我们的研究结果表明,(1)当用户收到系统如何纠正错误记忆的澄清时,他们会更满意;(2)用户甚至更喜欢失败的纠正尝试,而不是没有这样的尝试;(3)澄清的语气也必须考虑到最好的用户满意度。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assisting Health Consumers While Searching the Web through Medical Annotations Do Metrics Matter? Understanding Context for Tasks and Activities NotifyMeHere: Intelligent Notification Delivery in Multi-Device Environments Computational Surprise, Perceptual Surprise, and Personal Background in Text Understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1