Space, place and institutional effectiveness in higher education

P. Temple
{"title":"Space, place and institutional effectiveness in higher education","authors":"P. Temple","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2018.1442243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The possible connections between the physical form of a higher education institution and its effectiveness as a site for teaching, learning, scholarship and research have only become explicit, to some extent, from the mid-twentieth century. This may be thought surprising, not least in view of the large proportion of most institutional budgets devoted to creating and maintaining physical fabric. This lack of consideration is now being rectified from both theoretical and operational perspectives. Space and place – the latter conceptualised here as what people make of space – in higher education have come under examination in recent years from philosophical, sociological, pedagogic, architectural, and other perspectives. The conceptual breadth of these perspectives makes it difficult to analyse or to theorise convincingly in a general sense about physical space in higher education – to a greater extent, arguably, than for other overarching determinants of higher education outcomes. I present here some conclusions drawing on current understandings of the meanings of space and place in higher education; how they are seen as interacting (or not) with academic work; and what directions further work in this area might usefully take.","PeriodicalId":212965,"journal":{"name":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2018.1442243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

ABSTRACT The possible connections between the physical form of a higher education institution and its effectiveness as a site for teaching, learning, scholarship and research have only become explicit, to some extent, from the mid-twentieth century. This may be thought surprising, not least in view of the large proportion of most institutional budgets devoted to creating and maintaining physical fabric. This lack of consideration is now being rectified from both theoretical and operational perspectives. Space and place – the latter conceptualised here as what people make of space – in higher education have come under examination in recent years from philosophical, sociological, pedagogic, architectural, and other perspectives. The conceptual breadth of these perspectives makes it difficult to analyse or to theorise convincingly in a general sense about physical space in higher education – to a greater extent, arguably, than for other overarching determinants of higher education outcomes. I present here some conclusions drawing on current understandings of the meanings of space and place in higher education; how they are seen as interacting (or not) with academic work; and what directions further work in this area might usefully take.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育的空间、地点与制度效能
高等教育机构的实体形式与其作为教学、学习、学术和研究场所的有效性之间可能存在的联系,在某种程度上从20世纪中期开始才变得明确。这可能被认为是令人惊讶的,尤其是考虑到大多数机构预算的很大一部分专门用于创建和维护物理结构。这种缺乏考虑的情况现在正在从理论和业务两方面加以纠正。近年来,高等教育中的空间和地点——后者在这里被定义为人们如何利用空间——从哲学、社会学、教育学、建筑学和其他角度受到了审视。这些观点的概念广度使得很难在一般意义上对高等教育中的物理空间进行令人信服的分析或理论化——可以说,在更大程度上,比高等教育结果的其他总体决定因素更重要。在这里,我根据目前对高等教育中空间和地点含义的理解,提出一些结论;如何看待他们与学术工作的互动(或不互动);以及这一领域的进一步工作可能会采取哪些有益的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peeling the multiple layers of inequalities in free higher education policies Intermediary organizations and their role in advancing the SDGs in higher education Provincial government and institution level strategy setting: the case of building Chinese ‘world-class universities’ POLICY REVIEWS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EDITORIAL, Volume 7, Issue 2, September 2023 Isomorphic tensions and anxiety in UK social science doctoral provision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1