Billion Dollar Blind Spot - How the U.S. Tax Code's Small Business Expenditures Impact Women Business Owners

C. Bruckner
{"title":"Billion Dollar Blind Spot - How the U.S. Tax Code's Small Business Expenditures Impact Women Business Owners","authors":"C. Bruckner","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3004014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This latest report from the Kogod Tax Policy Center, in keeping with our mission to conduct nonpartisan policy research on tax issues specific to small businesses, provides an assessment of how the U.S. tax code’s more than $255 billion of tax expenditures targeted to help small businesses grow and access capital impact women-owned firms. The results are eye-opening. • We report that while women-owned firms have increased to now total more than 11 million (or 38% of all U.S. firms), the majority of women business owners are small businesses operating in service industries and they continue to have challenges growing their receipts and accessing capital. • At the same time, three of the four small business tax expenditures we assessed are so limited in design that they either (i) explicitly exclude service firms, and by extension, the majority of women-owned firms (Sec. 1202); or (ii) could effectively bypass women-owned firms who are not incorporated or who are service firms with few capital-intensive equipment investments altogether (Secs. 1244 and 179). • Our survey data of 515 experienced, engaged women business owners corroborates these findings, and nevertheless suggests that when women-owned firms can take advantage of tax breaks, they do. However, neither Congress nor Treasury or IRS or SBA has ever measured how the tax code impacts women business owners. • For example, we identified only three women business owners who had ever used Section 1202 - a $6 billion tax break - to raise capital for their firms. While we expect that more than three women-owned firms have used this provision since 1993, we don't have publicly-available taxpayer data to prove it. This ridiculous example highlights why we need tax research on women business owners. Similarly, our survey found that women business owners use Section 179 at significantly lower rates than existing government research finds for businesses generally. This tax break is one of the most expensive (it will cost $248 billion from 2016-2020), and yet we don’t have any research on how it benefits women business owners. • Our findings raise questions as to (i) whether the tax code’s small business tax expenditures are operating as Congress intended for these small businesses; and (ii) whether the cost of these expenditures has been accounted for in terms of their uptake by women-owned firms. In answering these questions impacting millions of women business owners, we report that policymakers and stakeholders have a billion dollar blind spot when it comes to understanding how effective small business tax expenditures are with respect to women-owned firms. This blind spot indicates Congress does not have data or research to make evidence-based tax policy decisions with respect to women business owners. Our research finds, among other things, that the tax-writing committees have yet to hold hearings specifically to address tax challenges women business owners encounter. Ultimately, this report recommends strategies for developing this research including: 1. Requesting the Congressional tax-writing committees hold hearings on the issues identified in the report; 2. Requesting the Joint Committee on Taxation develop estimates on how small business expenditures impact women-owned firms; 3. Requesting the federal Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking develop strategies for developing the data we need to measure these expenditures in terms of women-business owners; and 4. Requesting the nomination and confirmation of a new Director of the Census Bureau.","PeriodicalId":409712,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Entrepreneurs (Finance) (Topic)","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Entrepreneurs (Finance) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3004014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This latest report from the Kogod Tax Policy Center, in keeping with our mission to conduct nonpartisan policy research on tax issues specific to small businesses, provides an assessment of how the U.S. tax code’s more than $255 billion of tax expenditures targeted to help small businesses grow and access capital impact women-owned firms. The results are eye-opening. • We report that while women-owned firms have increased to now total more than 11 million (or 38% of all U.S. firms), the majority of women business owners are small businesses operating in service industries and they continue to have challenges growing their receipts and accessing capital. • At the same time, three of the four small business tax expenditures we assessed are so limited in design that they either (i) explicitly exclude service firms, and by extension, the majority of women-owned firms (Sec. 1202); or (ii) could effectively bypass women-owned firms who are not incorporated or who are service firms with few capital-intensive equipment investments altogether (Secs. 1244 and 179). • Our survey data of 515 experienced, engaged women business owners corroborates these findings, and nevertheless suggests that when women-owned firms can take advantage of tax breaks, they do. However, neither Congress nor Treasury or IRS or SBA has ever measured how the tax code impacts women business owners. • For example, we identified only three women business owners who had ever used Section 1202 - a $6 billion tax break - to raise capital for their firms. While we expect that more than three women-owned firms have used this provision since 1993, we don't have publicly-available taxpayer data to prove it. This ridiculous example highlights why we need tax research on women business owners. Similarly, our survey found that women business owners use Section 179 at significantly lower rates than existing government research finds for businesses generally. This tax break is one of the most expensive (it will cost $248 billion from 2016-2020), and yet we don’t have any research on how it benefits women business owners. • Our findings raise questions as to (i) whether the tax code’s small business tax expenditures are operating as Congress intended for these small businesses; and (ii) whether the cost of these expenditures has been accounted for in terms of their uptake by women-owned firms. In answering these questions impacting millions of women business owners, we report that policymakers and stakeholders have a billion dollar blind spot when it comes to understanding how effective small business tax expenditures are with respect to women-owned firms. This blind spot indicates Congress does not have data or research to make evidence-based tax policy decisions with respect to women business owners. Our research finds, among other things, that the tax-writing committees have yet to hold hearings specifically to address tax challenges women business owners encounter. Ultimately, this report recommends strategies for developing this research including: 1. Requesting the Congressional tax-writing committees hold hearings on the issues identified in the report; 2. Requesting the Joint Committee on Taxation develop estimates on how small business expenditures impact women-owned firms; 3. Requesting the federal Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking develop strategies for developing the data we need to measure these expenditures in terms of women-business owners; and 4. Requesting the nomination and confirmation of a new Director of the Census Bureau.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十亿美元盲点-美国税法的小企业支出如何影响女企业主
Kogod税收政策中心(Kogod Tax Policy Center)的使命是针对小企业的税收问题进行无党派政策研究,该中心的这份最新报告评估了美国税法中超过2550亿美元的税收支出是如何帮助小企业成长和获得资本的,并对女性拥有的企业产生了影响。研究结果令人大开眼界。•我们报告称,虽然女性拥有的公司总数已增加到1100多万家(占美国所有公司的38%),但大多数女性企业主都是服务行业的小型企业,她们在增加收入和获取资金方面仍然面临挑战。•与此同时,我们评估的四种小企业税收支出中有三种在设计上如此有限,以至于它们要么(i)明确排除了服务公司,并由此延伸,排除了大多数女性拥有的公司(第1202节);或者(ii)可以有效地绕过女性拥有的未注册公司或几乎没有资本密集型设备投资的服务公司(第1244和179条)。•我们对515名经验丰富、敬业的女性企业主的调查数据证实了这些发现,但也表明,当女性拥有的企业可以利用税收减免时,她们会这样做。然而,国会、财政部、国税局和小企业管理局都没有衡量过税法对女企业主的影响。•例如,我们发现只有三名女性企业主曾经利用1202条款(60亿美元的税收减免)为自己的公司筹集资金。虽然我们预计自1993年以来,有超过三家女性所有的公司使用了这一条款,但我们没有公开的纳税人数据来证明这一点。这个荒谬的例子凸显了为什么我们需要对女企业主进行税务研究。同样,我们的调查发现,女性企业主使用第179条的比例明显低于现有政府对企业的研究结果。这项税收减免是最昂贵的税收减免之一(从2016年到2020年将耗资2480亿美元),但我们没有任何关于它如何惠及女企业主的研究。•我们的研究结果提出了以下问题:(i)税法的小企业税收支出是否按照国会对这些小企业的预期运作;(二)这些支出的成本是否已按妇女拥有的公司的吸收情况计算在内。在回答这些影响数百万女性企业主的问题时,我们报告说,当涉及到了解小企业税收支出对女性拥有的公司的有效性时,政策制定者和利益相关者存在十亿美元的盲点。这一盲点表明,国会没有数据或研究,无法针对女企业主做出基于证据的税收政策决定。我们的研究发现,除其他事项外,税务编写委员会尚未专门举行听证会,以解决女性企业主遇到的税务挑战。最后,本报告建议开展这项研究的策略包括:1。要求国会税务编写委员会就报告中确定的问题举行听证会;2. 请税务联合委员会估计小企业支出如何影响妇女拥有的公司;3.要求联邦循证决策委员会制定战略,以编制我们所需的数据,以衡量女企业主的这些支出;和4。要求提名和确认新的人口普查局局长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REPUTATION AS CAPITAL – How DAOs Upgrade Finance The Start-up Decision Under Default Risk ICOs: A New Eldorado for Investors and a Revolution in Startup Financing? A Survey Enfranchising the crowd: Nominee account equity crowdfunding AFI Innovative Regulatory Approaches Toolkit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1