{"title":"Progress in Economics","authors":"Bradford Tuckfield","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2830873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an attempt to measure progress in economics research. In order to measure progress, we rely on an objective, standardized measure: economists’ accuracy forecasting macroeconomic indicators. We undertake a descriptive, exploratory study of trends over time in economic forecasting accuracy. Data comes from professionals’ forecasts of US unemployment and nominal GDP since 1968. The analysis here shows no evidence of improvement in forecasting accuracy. Several potential causes and implications of this finding are discussed.","PeriodicalId":308524,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Forecasting (Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Forecasting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to measure progress in economics research. In order to measure progress, we rely on an objective, standardized measure: economists’ accuracy forecasting macroeconomic indicators. We undertake a descriptive, exploratory study of trends over time in economic forecasting accuracy. Data comes from professionals’ forecasts of US unemployment and nominal GDP since 1968. The analysis here shows no evidence of improvement in forecasting accuracy. Several potential causes and implications of this finding are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学进展
本文试图衡量经济学研究的进展。为了衡量进步,我们依赖于一个客观的、标准化的衡量标准:经济学家对宏观经济指标的预测准确性。我们对经济预测准确度随时间变化的趋势进行描述性、探索性研究。数据来自专业人士对1968年以来美国失业率和名义GDP的预测。这里的分析显示,没有证据表明预测准确性有所提高。讨论了这一发现的几个潜在原因和含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Embrace the Differences: Revisiting the Pollyvote Method of Combining Forecasts for U.S. Presidential Elections (2004 to 2020) A Century of Economic Policy Uncertainty Through the French-Canadian Lens Informational Efficiency and Behaviour Within In-Play Prediction Markets A New Class of Robust Observation-Driven Models Modelling and Forecasting of the Nigerian Stock Exchange.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1