Understanding motivation and what works to motivate male offenders into engaging with treatment: A rapid evidence assessment

L. Forgione, Jacob Seaward
{"title":"Understanding motivation and what works to motivate male offenders into engaging with treatment: A rapid evidence assessment","authors":"L. Forgione, Jacob Seaward","doi":"10.53841/bpsfu.2021.1.136.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:The development of motivational programmes that are able to successfully enhance offenders’ readiness for treatment could mean that more individuals may decide to partake in programmes.Aims:The aim of this research is to explore the existing evidence on the topic in order to answer two main questions: 1) What factors are associated with motivation to engage in interventions?; 2) What works as best practice for motivation and readiness enhancement?Method:This study utilised a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) methodology, looking in particular at the existing studies with the following characteristics: English language, published globally, between the years 2005–2020, and Peer-reviewed-only.Results:From a total of 3596 papers obtained with the initial searches, a total of six studies were eventually selected as the most suitable for this review overall. These covered three main areas: (1) assessments tools currently available; (2) factors specifically associated with motivation and readiness; and (3) relevant processes/interventions that directly affect motivation or readiness.Conclusions/Implications for practice:With regards to the factors (and barriers) linked to motivation and readiness to engage with treatment, the evidence presented in this review confirmed the multi-factorial nature of these concepts. The proposed synthesis seems to be in line with what is outlined within the Multifactor Offender Readiness Model (MORM; Ward et al., 2004) and the main point that emerged from this review is that offenders’ motivation and readiness is best understood through aspects that are both internal to the person or that depend on individuals, and external, in the features of the context, environment and people that surround them. As regards interventions to enhance readiness and motivation, the evidence is rather limited and mainly restricted to specific types of offenders; based on what is available, it appears that some interventions with this purpose can have positive effects on individuals.","PeriodicalId":426788,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Update","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfu.2021.1.136.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:The development of motivational programmes that are able to successfully enhance offenders’ readiness for treatment could mean that more individuals may decide to partake in programmes.Aims:The aim of this research is to explore the existing evidence on the topic in order to answer two main questions: 1) What factors are associated with motivation to engage in interventions?; 2) What works as best practice for motivation and readiness enhancement?Method:This study utilised a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) methodology, looking in particular at the existing studies with the following characteristics: English language, published globally, between the years 2005–2020, and Peer-reviewed-only.Results:From a total of 3596 papers obtained with the initial searches, a total of six studies were eventually selected as the most suitable for this review overall. These covered three main areas: (1) assessments tools currently available; (2) factors specifically associated with motivation and readiness; and (3) relevant processes/interventions that directly affect motivation or readiness.Conclusions/Implications for practice:With regards to the factors (and barriers) linked to motivation and readiness to engage with treatment, the evidence presented in this review confirmed the multi-factorial nature of these concepts. The proposed synthesis seems to be in line with what is outlined within the Multifactor Offender Readiness Model (MORM; Ward et al., 2004) and the main point that emerged from this review is that offenders’ motivation and readiness is best understood through aspects that are both internal to the person or that depend on individuals, and external, in the features of the context, environment and people that surround them. As regards interventions to enhance readiness and motivation, the evidence is rather limited and mainly restricted to specific types of offenders; based on what is available, it appears that some interventions with this purpose can have positive effects on individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解动机和什么能有效地激励男性罪犯参与治疗:快速证据评估
背景:激励计划的发展能够成功地提高罪犯对治疗的准备,这可能意味着更多的人可能决定参加计划。目的:本研究的目的是探索关于该主题的现有证据,以回答两个主要问题:1)哪些因素与参与干预的动机相关?2)什么是激励和准备增强的最佳实践?方法:本研究采用快速证据评估(REA)方法,特别关注具有以下特征的现有研究:2005-2020年间在全球范围内发表的英语研究,以及仅进行同行评议的研究。结果:从初步检索获得的3596篇论文中,最终选出了6篇研究作为最适合本综述的研究。这包括三个主要领域:(1)目前可用的评估工具;(2)与动机和准备具体相关的因素;(3)直接影响动机或准备的相关过程/干预。结论/对实践的影响:关于与动机和治疗准备相关的因素(和障碍),本综述中提出的证据证实了这些概念的多因素性质。拟议的综合似乎与多因素罪犯准备模型(MORM;Ward et al., 2004),从这一综述中得出的主要观点是,犯罪者的动机和准备情况最好通过个人内部或取决于个人的方面和外部的方面来理解,即背景、环境和周围的人的特征。关于加强准备和动机的干预措施,证据相当有限,主要限于特定类型的罪犯;根据现有的情况,似乎有一些这样的干预措施可以对个人产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial from the guest editors Reflections as a programme leader of MSc forensic psychology: Decolonising the forensic psychology curriculum in higher education Equality, diversity and inclusion in forensic practice Improving access to forensic psychology education and training for learners with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Reflections on the role of religion in desistance and mental wellbeing for forensic clients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1