Evaluation of Bovine Derived Xenograft Combined with Bioresorbable Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Intrabony Defects

R. Gorkhali, S. Pradhan, Rejina Shrestha, Shweta Agrawal, Krishna Lamicchane, P. Koirala, Benju Shrestha
{"title":"Evaluation of Bovine Derived Xenograft Combined with Bioresorbable Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Intrabony Defects","authors":"R. Gorkhali, S. Pradhan, Rejina Shrestha, Shweta Agrawal, Krishna Lamicchane, P. Koirala, Benju Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/jnspoi.v4i2.34231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Treatment of periodontal diseases done by surgical therapy depends upon extent and severity of disease. The ultimate goal of periodontal reconstructive surgery is to regenerate tissues destroyed during periodontal disease. \nObjective: To evaluate the effectiveness of bovine-derived xenograft with collagen membrane in treatment of intrabony defects by comparing it with open flap debridement alone. \nMethods: This non-randomised controlled trial was conducted after ethical clearance, at Bir hospital from 2018 March to 2019 April. The study recruited 38 patients by convenience sampling, age from 25-44 years, with chronic periodontitis, and willing to sign informed consent. Intrabony defects were treated by open flap debridement with bovine-derived xenograft and bioresorbable collagen membrane (Test group) and open flap debridement alone (Control group). Probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, oral hygiene status, and gingival status were assessed at baseline and six months. \nResults: Six months after therapy, in Test group probing pocket depth reduction was 5.2 mm and gain in mean clinical attachment level was 4.3 mm. In Control group, mean probing pocket depth reduction was 3.8 mm and mean gain in clinical attachment level was 2.7 mm. The test treatment resulted in statistically higher probing pocket depth reduction and clinical attachment level gain than Control group. \nConclusion: Both therapies resulted in significant probing pocket depth reductions and clinical attachment gains, and treatment with open flap debridement with bovine-derived xenografts and collagen membrane resulted in significantly higher probing pocket depth reduction and clinical attachment gain than treatment with open flap debridement alone.","PeriodicalId":282202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalese Society of Periodontology and Oral Implantology","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalese Society of Periodontology and Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnspoi.v4i2.34231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of periodontal diseases done by surgical therapy depends upon extent and severity of disease. The ultimate goal of periodontal reconstructive surgery is to regenerate tissues destroyed during periodontal disease. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of bovine-derived xenograft with collagen membrane in treatment of intrabony defects by comparing it with open flap debridement alone. Methods: This non-randomised controlled trial was conducted after ethical clearance, at Bir hospital from 2018 March to 2019 April. The study recruited 38 patients by convenience sampling, age from 25-44 years, with chronic periodontitis, and willing to sign informed consent. Intrabony defects were treated by open flap debridement with bovine-derived xenograft and bioresorbable collagen membrane (Test group) and open flap debridement alone (Control group). Probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, oral hygiene status, and gingival status were assessed at baseline and six months. Results: Six months after therapy, in Test group probing pocket depth reduction was 5.2 mm and gain in mean clinical attachment level was 4.3 mm. In Control group, mean probing pocket depth reduction was 3.8 mm and mean gain in clinical attachment level was 2.7 mm. The test treatment resulted in statistically higher probing pocket depth reduction and clinical attachment level gain than Control group. Conclusion: Both therapies resulted in significant probing pocket depth reductions and clinical attachment gains, and treatment with open flap debridement with bovine-derived xenografts and collagen membrane resulted in significantly higher probing pocket depth reduction and clinical attachment gain than treatment with open flap debridement alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛源异种移植物联合生物可吸收胶原膜治疗骨内缺损的疗效评价
牙周病的手术治疗取决于疾病的程度和严重程度。牙周重建手术的最终目的是使牙周疾病中受损的组织再生。目的:通过与单纯开瓣清创术的比较,评价牛源异种胶原膜移植术治疗骨内缺损的疗效。方法:该非随机对照试验经伦理许可,于2018年3月至2019年4月在Bir医院进行。本研究采用方便抽样的方法招募了38例慢性牙周炎患者,年龄在25-44岁之间,并愿意签署知情同意书。采用牛源异种骨移植和生物可吸收胶原膜联合开放瓣清创治疗骨内缺损(试验组)和单独开放瓣清创治疗骨内缺损(对照组)。在基线和6个月时评估探测袋深度、临床附着水平、牙龈退缩、口腔卫生状况和牙龈状况。结果:治疗6个月后,试验组探诊袋深度减小5.2 mm,平均临床附着度增加4.3 mm。对照组探查袋深度平均减少3.8 mm,临床附着水平平均增加2.7 mm。试验性治疗的探查袋深度减小和临床依恋水平增加均高于对照组。结论:两种治疗方法均可显著降低探囊深度和增加临床附着,且牛源异种移植物和胶原膜开放瓣清创治疗的探囊深度和增加临床附着明显高于单独开放瓣清创治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness in Maxillary Central Incisor using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Variations in Maxillary Frenal Morphology in a Sample of Newari Children of Bhaktapur Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Chronic Periodontitis Pattern of Malocclusion in Patients undergoing Orthodontic Treatment at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Occurrence of Extra Roots in Permanent Mandibular Molars: A Cone Beam Computed Topography Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1