Gulf of Thailand 4-String Well Design Transformation Using MPD System – Cost Saving, Operational Challenges and Learnings

Harpreet Kaur Dalgit Singh, E. Sammat, Thakornpol Kleawyothatis, Kittikun Niracharopas, Kazem Kiani Nassab
{"title":"Gulf of Thailand 4-String Well Design Transformation Using MPD System – Cost Saving, Operational Challenges and Learnings","authors":"Harpreet Kaur Dalgit Singh, E. Sammat, Thakornpol Kleawyothatis, Kittikun Niracharopas, Kazem Kiani Nassab","doi":"10.2118/209911-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Gulf of Thailand (GoT) or Gulf of Siam is mainly offshore development gas wells in Thailand. Well C and well H were originally designed with GoT 4-string standard template. However, Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) solution was then selected to save one (1) casing string provided that the maximum expected formation pressure to be within the range of 1.46-1.50SG as per geological prognosis. Both wells were drilled to plan TD with 3-casing strings as planned to result in a cost-saving from the design transformation (4-strings to 3-strings) using the MPD system.\n There is always a risk of lost circulation and ballooning in intermediate/high-pressure wells (Pore Pressure (PP) > 1.45SG) when drilling conventionally with 3-casing strings (instead of GoT 4-string standard design). Required high mud weight imposes an overbalance during drilling and tripping operations that exceed formation integrity at shallower depths below the 7\" casing. MPD is a proven technology for maintaining Constant Bottom Hole Pressure (CBHP) that enables precise control on wellbore pressure to mitigate ballooning and kick/loss hazards, narrow margin drilling window, and formation pressure uncertainties. The 6-1/8\" hole sections of both wells were drilled with the MPD technology to mitigate the loss of circulation and ballooning while drilling.\n MPD system worked for this project to drill the wells to TD successfully according to the plan and without any major issue. The MPD solution enabled drilling with the lowest and safest underbalanced mud weight to allow a reduction in Bottom Hole Pressure (BHP) and consequently eliminated ballooning while drilling. Surface back pressure (SBP) on connections was increased (compared to the plan) based on connection gas reading caused by pore pressure uncertainties. MPD dynamic formation integrity test (DFIT) and static pore pressure tests (PPT) have established a baseline for heavy kill mud weight estimations and displacing before tripping out of the hole. Observations and learnings from well C confirmed the study’s preliminary conclusions that the 4-strings transformation is quite challenging for PP greater than 1.55SG, and 4-string transformation is not recommended if PP exceeds 1.60SG. The wells were completed with 3-casing strings however, no NPT related to well design and MPD was encountered. The technology was proven and allowed to drill the well with 3-strings design. The solution can save some cost in intermediate pressure wells (1.46-1.54SG PP), and it is proposed for the next trials with more focus on wellbore conditioning and tripping practices.","PeriodicalId":385340,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, August 09, 2022","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, August 09, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209911-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gulf of Thailand (GoT) or Gulf of Siam is mainly offshore development gas wells in Thailand. Well C and well H were originally designed with GoT 4-string standard template. However, Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) solution was then selected to save one (1) casing string provided that the maximum expected formation pressure to be within the range of 1.46-1.50SG as per geological prognosis. Both wells were drilled to plan TD with 3-casing strings as planned to result in a cost-saving from the design transformation (4-strings to 3-strings) using the MPD system. There is always a risk of lost circulation and ballooning in intermediate/high-pressure wells (Pore Pressure (PP) > 1.45SG) when drilling conventionally with 3-casing strings (instead of GoT 4-string standard design). Required high mud weight imposes an overbalance during drilling and tripping operations that exceed formation integrity at shallower depths below the 7" casing. MPD is a proven technology for maintaining Constant Bottom Hole Pressure (CBHP) that enables precise control on wellbore pressure to mitigate ballooning and kick/loss hazards, narrow margin drilling window, and formation pressure uncertainties. The 6-1/8" hole sections of both wells were drilled with the MPD technology to mitigate the loss of circulation and ballooning while drilling. MPD system worked for this project to drill the wells to TD successfully according to the plan and without any major issue. The MPD solution enabled drilling with the lowest and safest underbalanced mud weight to allow a reduction in Bottom Hole Pressure (BHP) and consequently eliminated ballooning while drilling. Surface back pressure (SBP) on connections was increased (compared to the plan) based on connection gas reading caused by pore pressure uncertainties. MPD dynamic formation integrity test (DFIT) and static pore pressure tests (PPT) have established a baseline for heavy kill mud weight estimations and displacing before tripping out of the hole. Observations and learnings from well C confirmed the study’s preliminary conclusions that the 4-strings transformation is quite challenging for PP greater than 1.55SG, and 4-string transformation is not recommended if PP exceeds 1.60SG. The wells were completed with 3-casing strings however, no NPT related to well design and MPD was encountered. The technology was proven and allowed to drill the well with 3-strings design. The solution can save some cost in intermediate pressure wells (1.46-1.54SG PP), and it is proposed for the next trials with more focus on wellbore conditioning and tripping practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用MPD系统进行泰国湾四管柱井设计改造—节约成本、操作挑战和经验教训
泰国湾(GoT)或暹罗湾(Gulf of Siam)是泰国主要的海上开发气井。井C和井H最初设计为GoT四管柱标准模板。然而,根据地质预测,如果最大预期地层压力在1.46-1.50SG范围内,则选择控压钻井(MPD)解决方案来节省1个套管柱。这两口井都按照计划使用了3套管柱,从而节省了使用MPD系统进行设计转换(4管柱到3管柱)的成本。在中高压井(孔隙压力(PP) > 1.45SG)中,使用常规的三套管柱(而不是GoT的标准四套管柱设计)钻井时,总是存在漏失和膨胀的风险。在钻井和起下钻作业中,要求的高泥浆比重会造成过平衡,在7”套管以下的较浅深度会破坏地层完整性。MPD是一项经过验证的技术,可保持井底恒定压力(CBHP),可以精确控制井筒压力,以减轻膨胀、井涌/漏失风险、窄边际钻井窗口和地层压力不确定性。这两口井的6-1/8”井段都采用了MPD技术,以减少钻井过程中的循环漏失和膨胀。MPD系统在该项目中按照计划顺利钻至完井,没有出现任何重大问题。MPD解决方案能够以最低和最安全的欠平衡泥浆重量进行钻井,从而降低井底压力(BHP),从而消除钻井过程中的膨胀。基于孔隙压力不确定性导致的连接气体读数,连接上的表面背压(SBP)增加了(与计划相比)。MPD动态地层完整性测试(DFIT)和静态孔隙压力测试(PPT)为重压井泥浆比重估算和起下钻前的驱替建立了基准。C井的观察和学习证实了研究的初步结论,即当PP大于1.55SG时,4管柱改造具有相当大的挑战性,当PP超过1.60SG时,不建议进行4管柱改造。这些井采用了3套管柱完井,但没有遇到与井设计和MPD相关的NPT。该技术经过验证,可以使用三管柱钻井。该解决方案可以在中压井(1.46-1.54SG PP)中节省一些成本,并且建议在接下来的试验中更加关注井筒调节和起下钻实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Easy Life with Automated Digitalised Analytic Tools for Well Integrity Management for Unstructured Brown Field Continuous Improvement on the Performance of Innovative 360 Rolling Diamond Element and Conical Diamond Element Bit led to Save 2.9 Days from Drilling in Hard and Abrasive Sandstone Formation Implementation of Well Delivery Process Application, A Success Story of Digitalization in Well Design Process Advance Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Image Logs Application for Predicting Particle Sand Distribution Conceptual Casing Design for a HPHT Carbonate Development Project with High CO2 and H2S Contaminants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1