The China-U.S. Equity Valuation Gap

G. Bekaert, Shuojia Ke, Xiaoyan Zhang
{"title":"The China-U.S. Equity Valuation Gap","authors":"G. Bekaert, Shuojia Ke, Xiaoyan Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3760292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before 2009, the market average price earnings ratio of Chinese firms is significantly higher than that of the U.S. firms, while after 2009, the valuation gap reverses. Using data from 1995 to 2018, we examine the dynamics and sources of valuation differentials between comparable Chinese and U.S. firms. The sectoral composition of the indices plays a minimal role but growth expectations, financial openness, financial development, and (changes in) the investor base, all contribute substantially to the cross-sector and time-series variation of the valuation differentials. Financial openness and changing growth expectations are the most important contributors.","PeriodicalId":189146,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Political Risk & Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Political Risk & Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Before 2009, the market average price earnings ratio of Chinese firms is significantly higher than that of the U.S. firms, while after 2009, the valuation gap reverses. Using data from 1995 to 2018, we examine the dynamics and sources of valuation differentials between comparable Chinese and U.S. firms. The sectoral composition of the indices plays a minimal role but growth expectations, financial openness, financial development, and (changes in) the investor base, all contribute substantially to the cross-sector and time-series variation of the valuation differentials. Financial openness and changing growth expectations are the most important contributors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美。股权估值差距
在2009年之前,中国公司的市场平均市盈率明显高于美国公司,而在2009年之后,估值差距逆转。利用1995年至2018年的数据,我们研究了可比较的中美公司之间估值差异的动态和来源。指数的行业构成作用很小,但增长预期、金融开放、金融发展和投资者基础(变化)都对估值差异的跨行业和时间序列变化做出了重大贡献。金融开放和增长预期变化是最重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Firm-Level Political Risk Priced in the Equity Option Market? Trade Policy Uncertainty and Global Stock Returns: Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election Precious Neighbors: The Value of Co-locating with the Government The Politics of Corporate Investment: Evidence from Political Turnovers and IPO Proceeds Political Connections, Allocation of Stimulus Spending, and the Jobs Multiplier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1