Focusing Requirements Elicitation by Using a UX Measurement Method

Kyoko Ohashi, Asako Katayama, Naoki Hasegawa, H. Kurihara, Rieko Yamamoto, Jörg Dörr, Dominik Magin
{"title":"Focusing Requirements Elicitation by Using a UX Measurement Method","authors":"Kyoko Ohashi, Asako Katayama, Naoki Hasegawa, H. Kurihara, Rieko Yamamoto, Jörg Dörr, Dominik Magin","doi":"10.1109/RE.2018.00-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many User Experience (UX) activities are carried out during requirements engineering phases, e.g. understanding and assessing the UX of existing systems, and eliciting functional and non-functional requirements that improve UX. These activities are typically performed by requirements engineers who are non-UX experts. It is necessary to provide a good UX in order to ensure long-term motivation of users, especially in business applications. UX has various characteristics of differing importance; it can be difficult for RE engineers to grasp all characteristics of UX and to judge which characteristics are important and which need to be improved. We propose a two-step approach to solve these difficulties. The first step is the definition of a UX quality model and corresponding metrics. We propose an approach to calculate the UX score of a business application using the value of these metrics. The second step is a process to identify insufficient characteristics within the calculated UX score. In this paper we present the aforementioned approach to collect and calculate the UX score of a product, show how to identify serious UX-related problems as part of requirements engineering activities, and present the results obtained from an initial validation of our quality model and related questionnaire. With our approach, we enable RE experts who are non-UX experts to find the necessary requirements to improve UX.","PeriodicalId":445032,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Many User Experience (UX) activities are carried out during requirements engineering phases, e.g. understanding and assessing the UX of existing systems, and eliciting functional and non-functional requirements that improve UX. These activities are typically performed by requirements engineers who are non-UX experts. It is necessary to provide a good UX in order to ensure long-term motivation of users, especially in business applications. UX has various characteristics of differing importance; it can be difficult for RE engineers to grasp all characteristics of UX and to judge which characteristics are important and which need to be improved. We propose a two-step approach to solve these difficulties. The first step is the definition of a UX quality model and corresponding metrics. We propose an approach to calculate the UX score of a business application using the value of these metrics. The second step is a process to identify insufficient characteristics within the calculated UX score. In this paper we present the aforementioned approach to collect and calculate the UX score of a product, show how to identify serious UX-related problems as part of requirements engineering activities, and present the results obtained from an initial validation of our quality model and related questionnaire. With our approach, we enable RE experts who are non-UX experts to find the necessary requirements to improve UX.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用用户体验测量方法的聚焦需求引出
许多用户体验(UX)活动是在需求工程阶段进行的,例如理解和评估现有系统的用户体验,以及引出改善用户体验的功能和非功能需求。这些活动通常由非ux专家的需求工程师执行。为了保证用户的长期动机,提供良好的用户体验是必要的,尤其是在商业应用程序中。用户体验具有不同重要性的各种特征;对于RE工程师来说,掌握用户体验的所有特征并判断哪些特征是重要的,哪些需要改进是很困难的。我们建议采取两步走的办法来解决这些困难。第一步是定义用户体验质量模型和相应的度量标准。我们提出了一种使用这些指标的值来计算业务应用程序的用户体验评分的方法。第二步是在计算的UX评分中识别不足特征的过程。在本文中,我们介绍了前面提到的收集和计算产品用户体验分数的方法,展示了如何识别与用户体验相关的严重问题,作为需求工程活动的一部分,并介绍了从我们的质量模型和相关问卷的初始验证中获得的结果。通过我们的方法,我们使非UX专家的RE专家能够找到必要的需求来改进UX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CaRE: A Refinement Calculus for Requirements Engineering Based on Argumentation Semantics The Grace Period Has Ended: An Approach to Operationalize GDPR Requirements The Manager Perspective on Requirements Impact on Automotive Systems Development Speed Data Driven Requirements Engineering: Implications for the Community [Publisher's information]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1