Evaluation of the backoff procedure of Homeplug MAC vs. DCF

C. Cano, D. Malone
{"title":"Evaluation of the backoff procedure of Homeplug MAC vs. DCF","authors":"C. Cano, D. Malone","doi":"10.1109/PIMRC.2013.6666443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standardized Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols for Power Line Communication (PLC) networks (Homeplug and IEEE 1901) are based on the Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) defined for IEEE 802.11. However, the backoff procedure is modified with the goal of decreasing the collision probability. In this work, the backoff procedure of PLC MAC protocols is compared to DCF in different traffic conditions and scenarios, including scenarios with all nodes in coverage range as well as topologies with hidden and exposed terminal problems. The goal is to demonstrate and quantify the pros and cons of each approach in each particular case. Results show that the modified backoff procedure of the Homeplug MAC reduces the collision probability when there is high contention. However, the performance is not always improved compared to DCF. Moreover, when Homeplug provides better performance than the vanilla DCF, we show that the DCF can be easily tuned to achieve similar gains.","PeriodicalId":210993,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2013.6666443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The standardized Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols for Power Line Communication (PLC) networks (Homeplug and IEEE 1901) are based on the Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) defined for IEEE 802.11. However, the backoff procedure is modified with the goal of decreasing the collision probability. In this work, the backoff procedure of PLC MAC protocols is compared to DCF in different traffic conditions and scenarios, including scenarios with all nodes in coverage range as well as topologies with hidden and exposed terminal problems. The goal is to demonstrate and quantify the pros and cons of each approach in each particular case. Results show that the modified backoff procedure of the Homeplug MAC reduces the collision probability when there is high contention. However, the performance is not always improved compared to DCF. Moreover, when Homeplug provides better performance than the vanilla DCF, we show that the DCF can be easily tuned to achieve similar gains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Homeplug MAC与DCF退退过程的比较
电力线通信(PLC)网络(Homeplug和IEEE 1901)的标准化介质访问控制(MAC)协议基于IEEE 802.11定义的分布式协调函数(DCF)。然而,为了降低碰撞概率,对退退过程进行了改进。在本工作中,将PLC MAC协议的退退过程与DCF在不同的流量条件和场景下进行了比较,包括所有节点都在覆盖范围内的场景,以及隐藏和暴露终端问题的拓扑。目标是在每个特定情况下演示和量化每种方法的优缺点。结果表明,改进的Homeplug MAC退避程序降低了高争用情况下的碰撞概率。然而,与DCF相比,性能并不总是得到改善。此外,当Homeplug提供比普通DCF更好的性能时,我们表明DCF可以很容易地调整以获得类似的增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental validation of fog models for FSO under laboratory controlled conditions EWMA-triggered waterfilling for reduced-complexity resource management in ad-hoc connections Sleep scheduling in IEEE 802.16j relay networks A comparison of implicit and explicit channel feedback methods for MU-MIMO WLAN systems Optimization of collaborating secondary users in a cooperative sensing under noise uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1