GRADES VS UNIVERSITY PRESTIGE? A STUDY ON THE RETURNS TO EDUCATION

Jose A Rosa
{"title":"GRADES VS UNIVERSITY PRESTIGE? A STUDY ON THE RETURNS TO EDUCATION","authors":"Jose A Rosa","doi":"10.5070/M4122049573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Rosa, Jose A. | Abstract: This is a study determining which factor is a stronger return to education in a post-undergraduate setting: Grade Point Average (GPA) or the perceived “prestige” of the University attended. To classify what is considered “prestigious” and non- “prestigious”, I used rankings from the U.S News Best Colleges Rankings to classify the University of California campuses onto two separate tiers based on these rankings. I implement a survey on Amazon Mechanical Turk, in which subjects are asked whether they would prefer to hire a job candidate with a higher GPA from a lower tier university versus a job candidate with a lower GPA from a higher tier university. Using this survey data, I find that subjects have a strong preference for candidates with higher GPA. This preference still holds when including respondents that have hiring experience. The implications are that individuals will re-evaluate their preferences when applying to a university.","PeriodicalId":131320,"journal":{"name":"UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/M4122049573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): Rosa, Jose A. | Abstract: This is a study determining which factor is a stronger return to education in a post-undergraduate setting: Grade Point Average (GPA) or the perceived “prestige” of the University attended. To classify what is considered “prestigious” and non- “prestigious”, I used rankings from the U.S News Best Colleges Rankings to classify the University of California campuses onto two separate tiers based on these rankings. I implement a survey on Amazon Mechanical Turk, in which subjects are asked whether they would prefer to hire a job candidate with a higher GPA from a lower tier university versus a job candidate with a lower GPA from a higher tier university. Using this survey data, I find that subjects have a strong preference for candidates with higher GPA. This preference still holds when including respondents that have hiring experience. The implications are that individuals will re-evaluate their preferences when applying to a university.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成绩vs大学声望?教育回报的研究
摘要:这是一项研究,旨在确定在本科后的环境中,哪个因素更能带来更强的教育回报:平均成绩(GPA)还是所就读大学的“声望”。为了区分“名校”和“非名校”,我使用了《美国新闻与世界报道》最佳大学排名,根据这些排名将加州大学校园分为两个不同的等级。我在亚马逊土耳其机械(Amazon Mechanical Turk)上进行了一项调查,调查对象被问及,他们是更愿意雇佣来自低水平大学的GPA较高的求职者,还是来自高水平大学的GPA较低的求职者。通过这个调查数据,我发现科目对GPA高的候选人有强烈的偏好。当包括有招聘经验的受访者时,这种偏好仍然成立。这意味着个人在申请大学时将重新评估自己的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Hypersexuality Of Women and Videogames: The Effects It Has on Society and The Business Industry The Evolution and Spread of Antibiotic Resistance in Microorganisms The Effects of Insecurity on Lifetime Happiness: A Review of the Literature and a Study A Literature Review on the Lack of Research of Emotional Abuse and the Repercussions Associations Between Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Developing Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1