Patterns of online repeat victimisation and implications for crime prevention

S. Correia
{"title":"Patterns of online repeat victimisation and implications for crime prevention","authors":"S. Correia","doi":"10.1109/eCrime51433.2020.9493258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the characteristics of repeat victimisation (RV) in relation to fraud and computer misuse (F&CM) crimes recorded in Wales, United Kingdom (UK). The wider study included mixed-methods analysis of a sample of cases (n = 10,001) reported by individuals in Wales, over a period of two years (ending in September 2016). In this paper, key results from the quantitative part of this study concerning RV are presented. This paper contributes to an empirically grounded understanding RV with respect to F&CM and its insights are of direct relevance to theoretical understandings of victimisation and the formulation of interventions within the ‘Protect’ strand of policing in the UK. It suggests that older age is associated with RV for these crime types, that a repeat report is likely to be of the same general type as the crime which preceded it and that interventions to protect individuals from being re-victimised are best targeted within two weeks to one month of the first report. The paper also highlights the extent to which RV analysis is constrained by the rules which shape crime recording and identifies avenues for improvement of data collection and further research. Furthermore, it suggests the need to develop a framework of F&CM vulnerability which goes beyond risk of re-victimisation and better accounts for and enables a response to victims’ wider support needs.","PeriodicalId":103272,"journal":{"name":"2020 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research (eCrime)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/eCrime51433.2020.9493258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper explores the characteristics of repeat victimisation (RV) in relation to fraud and computer misuse (F&CM) crimes recorded in Wales, United Kingdom (UK). The wider study included mixed-methods analysis of a sample of cases (n = 10,001) reported by individuals in Wales, over a period of two years (ending in September 2016). In this paper, key results from the quantitative part of this study concerning RV are presented. This paper contributes to an empirically grounded understanding RV with respect to F&CM and its insights are of direct relevance to theoretical understandings of victimisation and the formulation of interventions within the ‘Protect’ strand of policing in the UK. It suggests that older age is associated with RV for these crime types, that a repeat report is likely to be of the same general type as the crime which preceded it and that interventions to protect individuals from being re-victimised are best targeted within two weeks to one month of the first report. The paper also highlights the extent to which RV analysis is constrained by the rules which shape crime recording and identifies avenues for improvement of data collection and further research. Furthermore, it suggests the need to develop a framework of F&CM vulnerability which goes beyond risk of re-victimisation and better accounts for and enables a response to victims’ wider support needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网上重复受害的模式及其对预防犯罪的影响
本文探讨了在英国威尔士记录的欺诈和计算机滥用(F&CM)犯罪中重复受害(RV)的特征。更广泛的研究包括对威尔士个人报告的病例样本(n = 10,001)进行混合方法分析,为期两年(截至2016年9月)。本文介绍了本研究定量部分关于RV的主要结果。本文有助于对F&CM方面的经验基础理解RV,其见解与受害的理论理解和英国警务“保护”链内干预措施的制定直接相关。研究表明,对于这些犯罪类型,年龄较大与RV有关,重复报告可能与之前的犯罪具有相同的一般类型,并且保护个人免受再次受害的干预措施最好在第一次报告后两周至一个月内进行。本文还强调了RV分析在多大程度上受到影响犯罪记录的规则的限制,并确定了改进数据收集和进一步研究的途径。此外,它建议需要制定一个F&CM脆弱性框架,该框架超越了再次受害的风险,更好地说明并能够对受害者更广泛的支持需求做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WordyThief: A Malicious Spammer Ten years of attacks on companies using visual impersonation of domain names When will my PLC support Mirai? The security economics of large-scale attacks against Internet-connected ICS devices Empirical Analysis of Losses from Business-Email Compromise eCrime 2020 Cover Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1