Uganda's 2006 multiparty elections: consolidating democracy and building peace?

S. Makara
{"title":"Uganda's 2006 multiparty elections: consolidating democracy and building peace?","authors":"S. Makara","doi":"10.4314/EAJPHR.V13I1.39343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiparty elections are generally perceived as a bedrock for democratization\nand good governance, if conducted in a free, fair and genuine manner.\nHowever, in conditions where such elections are shrouded in constitutional\nmanipulation, political opaqueness, greed and consolidation of personal rule,\nthey may instead, entrench an authoritarian regime. This article looks at the\neffects of the recent multiparty elections on the process of democratization\nand peace building in Uganda. It recognizes that both democratic governance\nand peace have eluded Uganda for a long time. The article is built on the\nbackground that Uganda's perennial socio-political crises have been partly a\nresult of the failure of the state to conduct free and fair elections. We conclude\nthat if the 2006 multiparty elections had been better organized, they could\nhave formed a milestone in furthering democracy and restoring peace and\norder in this turmoil-ridden country, and that since this was not the case; the\nprospect of mitigating the dangers of political conflicts will remain a maze. East African Journal of Peace and Human rights Vol. 13 (1) 2007: pp. 54-80","PeriodicalId":296246,"journal":{"name":"East African journal of peace and human rights","volume":"18 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African journal of peace and human rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EAJPHR.V13I1.39343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Multiparty elections are generally perceived as a bedrock for democratization and good governance, if conducted in a free, fair and genuine manner. However, in conditions where such elections are shrouded in constitutional manipulation, political opaqueness, greed and consolidation of personal rule, they may instead, entrench an authoritarian regime. This article looks at the effects of the recent multiparty elections on the process of democratization and peace building in Uganda. It recognizes that both democratic governance and peace have eluded Uganda for a long time. The article is built on the background that Uganda's perennial socio-political crises have been partly a result of the failure of the state to conduct free and fair elections. We conclude that if the 2006 multiparty elections had been better organized, they could have formed a milestone in furthering democracy and restoring peace and order in this turmoil-ridden country, and that since this was not the case; the prospect of mitigating the dangers of political conflicts will remain a maze. East African Journal of Peace and Human rights Vol. 13 (1) 2007: pp. 54-80
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达2006年多党选举:巩固民主与构建和平?
如果以自由、公平和真诚的方式进行,多党选举通常被认为是民主化和良好治理的基石。然而,在这种选举被宪法操纵、政治不透明、贪婪和个人统治巩固所笼罩的情况下,它们可能反而会巩固一个独裁政权。这篇文章着眼于最近的多党选举对乌干达民主化进程和和平建设的影响。它承认,乌干达长期以来一直没有实现民主治理与和平。这篇文章的背景是,乌干达长期的社会政治危机部分是由于国家未能进行自由公正的选举。我们的结论是,如果2006年的多党选举组织得更好,他们本可以在这个动荡不安的国家形成一个促进民主和恢复和平与秩序的里程碑,但事实并非如此;减轻政治冲突危险的前景仍将是一个迷宫。东非和平与人权杂志,2007年第13卷第1期,第54-80页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: pharmacists knowledge, perception and willingness to adopt future implementation in a Zimbabwean urban setting The International Criminal Court and Lubanga: The Feminist Critique and Jus Cogens Access To Information, Gender Participation And Good Governance In Uganda Translating socioeconomic rights from abstract paper rights to fully fledged individual rights: lessons from South Africa Globalization nonsense upon stilts? Reflections on the globalization and human rights nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1