Unintended Consequences: The Effect of Education Policy Announcements on Online Philanthropy

Anqi Wu, Aravinda Garimella, Ramanath Subramanyam
{"title":"Unintended Consequences: The Effect of Education Policy Announcements on Online Philanthropy","authors":"Anqi Wu, Aravinda Garimella, Ramanath Subramanyam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3779413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, grassroots altruism, enabled through online platforms such as DonorsChoose.org, has resulted in the successful funding of numerous essential public school projects across the country. While such channels become critical fundraising mechanisms, there is an unintended possibility of the crowding out of these sources by governmental initiatives that aim to address public school welfare and quality of education. In this study, with a focus on major public policy announcements, we examine whether there is an unintended effect of external measures, such as the signing of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), on grassroots altruism, as observed on online philanthropy platforms. We surmise that, in such platforms, donors could become complacent and take comfort in the cognizance of an external agency addressing the problems they care about — we term this the “savior effect”. Importantly, from our analysis of panel data on an education crowdfunding platform, we find (a) a decline in donations toward public school projects on the platform, and (b) that donations become more local, disproportionately impacting schools with high concentrations of low-income and minority students, which receive fewer instructional resources to begin with. Our work has important policy implications for public schools, donor communities, and online fundraising platforms.","PeriodicalId":150569,"journal":{"name":"IO: Theory eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Theory eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3779413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last two decades, grassroots altruism, enabled through online platforms such as DonorsChoose.org, has resulted in the successful funding of numerous essential public school projects across the country. While such channels become critical fundraising mechanisms, there is an unintended possibility of the crowding out of these sources by governmental initiatives that aim to address public school welfare and quality of education. In this study, with a focus on major public policy announcements, we examine whether there is an unintended effect of external measures, such as the signing of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), on grassroots altruism, as observed on online philanthropy platforms. We surmise that, in such platforms, donors could become complacent and take comfort in the cognizance of an external agency addressing the problems they care about — we term this the “savior effect”. Importantly, from our analysis of panel data on an education crowdfunding platform, we find (a) a decline in donations toward public school projects on the platform, and (b) that donations become more local, disproportionately impacting schools with high concentrations of low-income and minority students, which receive fewer instructional resources to begin with. Our work has important policy implications for public schools, donor communities, and online fundraising platforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意想不到的后果:教育政策公告对网络慈善的影响
在过去的二十年里,草根的利他主义,通过像DonorsChoose.org这样的在线平台,已经成功地为全国许多重要的公立学校项目提供了资金。虽然这些渠道成为关键的筹资机制,但政府旨在解决公立学校福利和教育质量问题的举措无意中挤占了这些来源。在这项研究中,我们将重点放在重大的公共政策公告上,研究外部措施(如《每个学生成功法案》(Every Student success Act, ESSA)的签署)是否会对在线慈善平台上观察到的基层利他主义产生意想不到的影响。我们推测,在这样的平台上,捐助者可能会变得自满,并因认识到有一个外部机构在解决他们关心的问题而感到宽慰——我们称之为“救世主效应”。重要的是,从我们对教育众筹平台上的面板数据的分析中,我们发现(a)平台上对公立学校项目的捐款有所下降,(b)捐赠变得更加本地化,不成比例地影响了低收入和少数民族学生高度集中的学校,这些学校一开始就获得较少的教学资源。我们的工作对公立学校、捐赠社区和在线筹款平台具有重要的政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gainers and Losers from Market Integration Price Authority under Competing Organizations Cash Hedging Motivates Information Sharing in Supply Chains Platform Competition and Interoperability: The Net Fee Model Risks and Global Supply Chains: What We Know and What We Need to Know
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1