The Bank Branch Exit Game

Alfredo Martín-Oliver, J. Sákovics, V. Salas-Fumás
{"title":"The Bank Branch Exit Game","authors":"Alfredo Martín-Oliver, J. Sákovics, V. Salas-Fumás","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3738528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the process of capacity reduction by multi-plant firms competing in many markets, following a permanent, negative aggregate demand shock. The resulting insight on strategic plant closure is relevant to competition policy. We focus on the measurement of strategic delay in local markets, using data on the closures of bank branches in Spain during the Great Recession. We geolocate each branch and identify its competitors: those that lie within 150 meters. We also cluster the local markets in the same census tract, enabling the use of fixed effects in our regressions. We find that branches with competitors are less likely to close in any given year than branches without, indicative of strategic behavior. Further -only when controlling for possible correlation between demand size and vulnerability to the shock, through fixed effects - the probability of exit is decreasing in the number of competitors. This is the opposite slope of what the literature -unable to use fixed effects - tends to find. We argue that this sign reversal is also rationalizable by a war of attrition. Finally, we confirm that branches are more likely to close if their parent bank has multiple branches in the same local market.","PeriodicalId":169574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3738528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the process of capacity reduction by multi-plant firms competing in many markets, following a permanent, negative aggregate demand shock. The resulting insight on strategic plant closure is relevant to competition policy. We focus on the measurement of strategic delay in local markets, using data on the closures of bank branches in Spain during the Great Recession. We geolocate each branch and identify its competitors: those that lie within 150 meters. We also cluster the local markets in the same census tract, enabling the use of fixed effects in our regressions. We find that branches with competitors are less likely to close in any given year than branches without, indicative of strategic behavior. Further -only when controlling for possible correlation between demand size and vulnerability to the shock, through fixed effects - the probability of exit is decreasing in the number of competitors. This is the opposite slope of what the literature -unable to use fixed effects - tends to find. We argue that this sign reversal is also rationalizable by a war of attrition. Finally, we confirm that branches are more likely to close if their parent bank has multiple branches in the same local market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行分行退出游戏
我们研究了在一个永久的、负的总需求冲击之后,在许多市场上竞争的多工厂企业的产能削减过程。由此产生的关于战略性工厂关闭的见解与竞争政策有关。我们使用大衰退期间西班牙银行分支机构关闭的数据,专注于衡量当地市场的战略延迟。我们对每个分支进行地理定位,并确定其竞争对手:那些在150米范围内的分支。我们还将当地市场聚集在同一人口普查区,使我们能够在回归中使用固定效应。我们发现,与没有竞争对手的分行相比,有竞争对手的分行在任何给定年份关闭的可能性都更小,这表明了战略行为。此外,只有在通过固定效应控制需求规模与对冲击的脆弱性之间可能存在的相关性时,退出的可能性才会随着竞争对手数量的减少而减少。这与文献——无法使用固定效应——倾向于发现的斜率相反。我们认为,这种迹象逆转也是合理的消耗战。最后,我们确认,如果其母银行在同一当地市场拥有多个分支机构,分支机构更有可能关闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Free Entry and Mergers Biosimilar Entry and the Pricing of Biologic Drugs Few Notes on Inequality in Israel: The Causes Behind Inequality Self-Preferencing in Markets with Vertically-Integrated Gatekeeper Platforms Vertical Contracts and Entry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1