Investigating the adequacy of physics textbooks used in Nigeria secondary schools for conceptual understanding with new physics curriculum in view

J. Chukwunenye, C. N. Ihekwaba, Benedict Ubawike Akano
{"title":"Investigating the adequacy of physics textbooks used in Nigeria secondary schools for conceptual understanding with new physics curriculum in view","authors":"J. Chukwunenye, C. N. Ihekwaba, Benedict Ubawike Akano","doi":"10.4314/STECH.V7I1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the adequacy of the physics textbooks in use in Senior Secondary Schools in Nigeria using Owerri municipal as case study. Five research questions guided the study. The sampled textual materials were the three recommended physics textbooks. Twenty six physics teachers from ten public secondary schools in Owerri municipal, Imo State were used. The evaluation of these text books were carried out using the 8 – point quantitative approach to content evaluation of science text books (QACEST) and teacher’s perception rating scales (TPRS). The 8 – point QACEST was used to answer research questions 1 to 4 while research question 5 was answered using teacher’s perception rating scale The result  revealed that while all the text books were adequate in terms of content and study questions inadequacies exist in some of the texts in the areas of learning activities, illustrations and teacher’s perception. This simply implies that no single text books have completely met the requirements of the new physics curriculum. However, teachers should not adhere to a particular text book but rather should expose their student to a variety of text books depending on the goal or aim of the lessons. Keywords: Investigating, Adequacy, Text book, conceptual understanding","PeriodicalId":272760,"journal":{"name":"AFRREV STECH: An International Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRREV STECH: An International Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/STECH.V7I1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the adequacy of the physics textbooks in use in Senior Secondary Schools in Nigeria using Owerri municipal as case study. Five research questions guided the study. The sampled textual materials were the three recommended physics textbooks. Twenty six physics teachers from ten public secondary schools in Owerri municipal, Imo State were used. The evaluation of these text books were carried out using the 8 – point quantitative approach to content evaluation of science text books (QACEST) and teacher’s perception rating scales (TPRS). The 8 – point QACEST was used to answer research questions 1 to 4 while research question 5 was answered using teacher’s perception rating scale The result  revealed that while all the text books were adequate in terms of content and study questions inadequacies exist in some of the texts in the areas of learning activities, illustrations and teacher’s perception. This simply implies that no single text books have completely met the requirements of the new physics curriculum. However, teachers should not adhere to a particular text book but rather should expose their student to a variety of text books depending on the goal or aim of the lessons. Keywords: Investigating, Adequacy, Text book, conceptual understanding
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查尼日利亚中学使用的物理教科书是否足够,以促进对新物理课程的概念理解
本研究以尼日利亚奥韦里市为个案,调查了尼日利亚高中物理教科书的充分性。五个研究问题指导了这项研究。选取的文本材料为三本推荐物理教材。使用了来自伊莫州奥韦里市10所公立中学的26名物理教师。采用科学教科书内容评价8点定量法(QACEST)和教师感知评定量表(TPRS)对这些教科书进行评价。研究性问题1至4采用QACEST 8分制,研究性问题5采用教师感知量表进行回答。结果显示,虽然所有教材在内容和学习问题方面都是足够的,但在学习活动、插图和教师感知方面,部分教材存在不足。这仅仅意味着没有一本教科书完全满足新物理课程的要求。然而,教师不应该坚持某一特定的教科书,而是应该根据课程的目标或目的,让学生接触各种各样的教科书。关键词:调查,充分性,课本,概念理解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ perception and background in chemistry: Implications for basic science education in primary schools Graduate students’ preferences in technology usage in student-faculty interactions at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana Ghanaian senior high school science students’ conceptions about change of state of matter Hormonal contraceptive use and women’s labour supply: Qualitative evidence from Kayonza District In Rwanda Cultural factors and traditional practices of the people In Delta State about HIV/AIDS pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1