{"title":"The Development of Arabic Multiple-Text and Composite Manuscripts: The Case of ḥadīth Manuscripts in Damascus during the Late Medieval Period","authors":"Konrad Hirschler","doi":"10.1515/9783110645989-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is based on documented book collections in pre-Ottoman Syria and focuses in particular on a corpus of Arabic ḥadīth manuscripts produced between the twelfth and fourteenth centuries. These manuscripts came mostly in the format of composite manuscripts, but occasionally also as multiple-text manuscripts. Many of them had originally been stand-alone booklets that were subsequently transformed into larger codices. This article shows how changes in the social and intellectual profile of a scholarly field (here ḥadīth studies) changes the materiality of the books the scholars used. The article furthermore argues that the term ‘majmūʿ’ that contemporaries used for composite and multiple-text manuscripts is meaningful when we consider the manuscripts not as ‘production units’, but as ‘circulation units’.","PeriodicalId":249673,"journal":{"name":"The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110645989-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article is based on documented book collections in pre-Ottoman Syria and focuses in particular on a corpus of Arabic ḥadīth manuscripts produced between the twelfth and fourteenth centuries. These manuscripts came mostly in the format of composite manuscripts, but occasionally also as multiple-text manuscripts. Many of them had originally been stand-alone booklets that were subsequently transformed into larger codices. This article shows how changes in the social and intellectual profile of a scholarly field (here ḥadīth studies) changes the materiality of the books the scholars used. The article furthermore argues that the term ‘majmūʿ’ that contemporaries used for composite and multiple-text manuscripts is meaningful when we consider the manuscripts not as ‘production units’, but as ‘circulation units’.