How public key cryptography influences wireless sensor node lifetime

K. Piotrowski, P. Langendörfer, Steffen Peter
{"title":"How public key cryptography influences wireless sensor node lifetime","authors":"K. Piotrowski, P. Langendörfer, Steffen Peter","doi":"10.1145/1180345.1180366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we try to estimate the real influence of public key cryptography (PKC) to the lifetime of a sensor node in wireless sensor networks. We investigate four types of nodes; MICA2DOT, MICA2, MICAz and TelosB. For all these nodes we estimate the power consumption for most common RSA and ECC operations, i.e., signature generation and verification as well as key exchange mechanisms. We also estimate the power consumed by the transmission of their results. Our results show that the application of strong cryptography is feasible. Even for the most constrained node performing the ECC-160 signature once every 10 minutes increases the duty cycle only by about 0.5 per cent, i.e., the influence to the lifetime is not significant. Nevertheless, the public key cryptography shall be used with care.","PeriodicalId":380051,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"251","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1180345.1180366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 251

Abstract

In this paper we try to estimate the real influence of public key cryptography (PKC) to the lifetime of a sensor node in wireless sensor networks. We investigate four types of nodes; MICA2DOT, MICA2, MICAz and TelosB. For all these nodes we estimate the power consumption for most common RSA and ECC operations, i.e., signature generation and verification as well as key exchange mechanisms. We also estimate the power consumed by the transmission of their results. Our results show that the application of strong cryptography is feasible. Even for the most constrained node performing the ECC-160 signature once every 10 minutes increases the duty cycle only by about 0.5 per cent, i.e., the influence to the lifetime is not significant. Nevertheless, the public key cryptography shall be used with care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公钥加密如何影响无线传感器节点寿命
在本文中,我们试图估计公钥加密(PKC)对无线传感器网络中传感器节点生命周期的实际影响。我们研究了四种类型的节点;MICA2DOT, MICA2, MICAz和TelosB。对于所有这些节点,我们估计了最常见的RSA和ECC操作的功耗,即签名生成和验证以及密钥交换机制。我们还估计了传输结果所消耗的功率。结果表明,强密码学的应用是可行的。即使对于每10分钟执行一次ECC-160签名的最受约束的节点,其占空比也仅增加约0.5%,即对寿命的影响并不显著。尽管如此,公钥加密应使用还是要小心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversify sensor nodes to improve resilience against node compromise Impact of optimal MAC layer attacks on the network layer SIGF: a family of configurable, secure routing protocols for wireless sensor networks Robust cooperative trust establishment for MANETs Seven cardinal properties of sensor network broadcast authentication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1