Exploring the Scientific Landscape of Internal Audit Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Joel Behrend, Marc Eulerich
{"title":"Exploring the Scientific Landscape of Internal Audit Research: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Joel Behrend, Marc Eulerich","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3178362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing the heavily increased attention on internal auditing in the post-SOX era, this paper aims to unravel the scientific metamorphosis of the topic within current accounting research, including the different scientific subareas that define it. In an attempt to extent the scant body of literature reviews that has focused on the internal audit function (IAF), we pursue an empirical approach to analyze the scientific structures and provide a variety of directions for future internal audit research. In this context, citation patterns extracted from 170 research articles published in five major accounting journals are being studied by combining co-citation and social network analysis in order to investigate different existing research domains of internal auditing and to discover the core work that has been done in this area. The scientific landscape of internal auditing can be characterized as profoundly fragmented and deeply rooted in different adjacent domains of accounting research. Identified subcategories from which research on internal auditing is derived can be summarized as Corporate Governance, Auditor Independence, Auditing Professionalization, Audit Committee Effectiveness, Reliance on Internal Auditing, Internal Control over Financial Reporting, and finally the Regulatory Framework. Additionally, results reveal the existence of a pivotal nucleus of research that emphasizes the increasingly important construct of internal audit quality. \nThe focus of this study lies on the analysis of major accounting journals, namely The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting Economics and Accounting, Organizations and Society and is restricted to the years from 1926 to 2016.","PeriodicalId":123337,"journal":{"name":"History of Accounting eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Addressing the heavily increased attention on internal auditing in the post-SOX era, this paper aims to unravel the scientific metamorphosis of the topic within current accounting research, including the different scientific subareas that define it. In an attempt to extent the scant body of literature reviews that has focused on the internal audit function (IAF), we pursue an empirical approach to analyze the scientific structures and provide a variety of directions for future internal audit research. In this context, citation patterns extracted from 170 research articles published in five major accounting journals are being studied by combining co-citation and social network analysis in order to investigate different existing research domains of internal auditing and to discover the core work that has been done in this area. The scientific landscape of internal auditing can be characterized as profoundly fragmented and deeply rooted in different adjacent domains of accounting research. Identified subcategories from which research on internal auditing is derived can be summarized as Corporate Governance, Auditor Independence, Auditing Professionalization, Audit Committee Effectiveness, Reliance on Internal Auditing, Internal Control over Financial Reporting, and finally the Regulatory Framework. Additionally, results reveal the existence of a pivotal nucleus of research that emphasizes the increasingly important construct of internal audit quality. The focus of this study lies on the analysis of major accounting journals, namely The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting Economics and Accounting, Organizations and Society and is restricted to the years from 1926 to 2016.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索内部审计研究的科学景观:文献计量分析
针对后sox时代对内部审计的高度关注,本文旨在揭示当前会计研究中该主题的科学蜕变,包括定义它的不同科学子领域。为了扩大关注内部审计职能(IAF)的文献综述的范围,我们采用实证方法来分析科学结构,并为未来的内部审计研究提供各种方向。在此背景下,我们将共被引和社会网络分析相结合,从五种主要会计期刊上发表的170篇研究论文中提取引文模式,以调查内部审计的不同现有研究领域,并发现该领域已经完成的核心工作。内部审计的科学景观可以被描述为深刻的碎片化和深深植根于不同的相邻会计研究领域。内部审计研究的派生子类别可以概括为公司治理,审计师独立性,审计专业化,审计委员会有效性,对内部审计的依赖,财务报告的内部控制,最后是监管框架。此外,研究结果还表明,存在一个关键的研究核心,即强调内部审计质量日益重要的结构。本研究的重点是对《会计评论》、《当代会计研究》、《会计研究杂志》、《会计经济与会计》、《组织与社会》等主要会计期刊进行分析,研究时间限于1926年至2016年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of U.S. Regulation and the Standard-Setting Process for Financial Reporting: 1930s to the Present Learning to Disclose: Disclosure Dynamics in the 1890s Streetcar Industry Financial Reporting by Charities: Why Do Some Choose to Report Under a More Extensive Reporting Framework? What Makes Research Possible? The Management Studies Research Division at the London School of Economics How America was Tricked on Tax Policy: Secrets and Undisclosed Practices - Book Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1