A weakest precondition approach to active attacks analysis

Musard Balliu, Isabella Mastroeni
{"title":"A weakest precondition approach to active attacks analysis","authors":"Musard Balliu, Isabella Mastroeni","doi":"10.1145/1554339.1554348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information flow controls can be used to protect both data confidentiality and data integrity. The certification of the security degree of a program that runs in untrusted environments still remains an open problem in language-based security. The notion of robustness asserts that an active attacker, who can modify program code in some fixed points (holes), is not able to disclose more private information than a passive attacker, who merely observes public data. In this paper, we extend a method recently proposed for checking declassified non-interference in presence of passive attackers only, in order to check robustness by means of the weakest precondition semantics. In particular, this semantics simulates the kind of analysis that can be performed by an attacker, i.e., from the public output towards the private input. The choice of the semantics lets us distinguish between different attacks models. In this paper, we also introduce relative robustness that is a relaxed notion of robustness for restricted classes of attacks.","PeriodicalId":119000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","volume":"40 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1554339.1554348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Information flow controls can be used to protect both data confidentiality and data integrity. The certification of the security degree of a program that runs in untrusted environments still remains an open problem in language-based security. The notion of robustness asserts that an active attacker, who can modify program code in some fixed points (holes), is not able to disclose more private information than a passive attacker, who merely observes public data. In this paper, we extend a method recently proposed for checking declassified non-interference in presence of passive attackers only, in order to check robustness by means of the weakest precondition semantics. In particular, this semantics simulates the kind of analysis that can be performed by an attacker, i.e., from the public output towards the private input. The choice of the semantics lets us distinguish between different attacks models. In this paper, we also introduce relative robustness that is a relaxed notion of robustness for restricted classes of attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动攻击分析的最弱前提方法
信息流控制可用于保护数据机密性和数据完整性。在不受信任的环境中运行的程序的安全程度的认证仍然是基于语言的安全性中的一个开放问题。健壮性的概念断言,可以修改某些固定点(漏洞)中的程序代码的主动攻击者不能比仅仅观察公共数据的被动攻击者泄露更多的私有信息。在本文中,我们扩展了最近提出的一种仅在被动攻击者存在时检查解密不干扰的方法,以便通过最弱前提语义来检查鲁棒性。特别是,该语义模拟了攻击者可以执行的分析类型,即从公共输出到私有输入。语义的选择使我们能够区分不同的攻击模型。在本文中,我们还引入了相对鲁棒性,这是对受限攻击类鲁棒性的一种宽松概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Faceted execution of policy-agnostic programs Position paper: the science of boxing Knowledge inference for optimizing secure multi-party computation Fault-tolerant non-interference: invited talk abstract WEBLOG: a declarative language for secure web development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1