Liability in Russian Corporate Law

V. Orlov
{"title":"Liability in Russian Corporate Law","authors":"V. Orlov","doi":"10.30958/ajl.7-1-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liability issues related to corporate activities are primarily regulated by general and special rules of the Civil Law in Russia that are mainly dispositive. The general liability rules consist of tort and contract liability provisions of the Civil Code. Special corporate norms are, in turn, included in the Civil Code provisions on juristic persons and legislation regulating corporate forms, and they concern liability of founders, shareholders and corporation as well as executives of corporation. The main form of civil liability is compensation for damages, the award for which generally requires that the illegal action and the caused damages as well as their causal relationship and the fault for causing the damages is proved in accordance with the rules on presumptions and burden of proof provided by the procedural rules. Traditionally, Russian civil liability rules have relied on the concept of illegality of an action (or breach of an obligation) that is to cause liability, which reflects the dominant role of legal supervision in the Russian legal system. However, in the event of liability of corporate executives, a breach of fiduciary duties could be regarded sufficient as a ground to qualify their actions as illegal without particular reference to concrete legal norms. Keywords: Civil liability; Corporation; Corporate executives; Illegality","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.7-1-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liability issues related to corporate activities are primarily regulated by general and special rules of the Civil Law in Russia that are mainly dispositive. The general liability rules consist of tort and contract liability provisions of the Civil Code. Special corporate norms are, in turn, included in the Civil Code provisions on juristic persons and legislation regulating corporate forms, and they concern liability of founders, shareholders and corporation as well as executives of corporation. The main form of civil liability is compensation for damages, the award for which generally requires that the illegal action and the caused damages as well as their causal relationship and the fault for causing the damages is proved in accordance with the rules on presumptions and burden of proof provided by the procedural rules. Traditionally, Russian civil liability rules have relied on the concept of illegality of an action (or breach of an obligation) that is to cause liability, which reflects the dominant role of legal supervision in the Russian legal system. However, in the event of liability of corporate executives, a breach of fiduciary duties could be regarded sufficient as a ground to qualify their actions as illegal without particular reference to concrete legal norms. Keywords: Civil liability; Corporation; Corporate executives; Illegality
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯公司法中的责任
与公司活动有关的责任问题主要由俄罗斯民法的一般规则和特殊规则来规范,这些规则主要是决定性的。一般责任规则由民法典中的侵权责任和合同责任条款组成。而《民法典》中关于法人的规定和规范公司形式的立法则包含了特别的公司规范,这些规范涉及创始人、股东和公司以及公司执行人员的责任。民事责任的主要形式是损害赔偿,其裁决一般要求根据程序规则的推定和举证责任规定,证明违法行为与所造成的损害及其因果关系和造成损害的过错。传统上,俄罗斯民事责任规则依赖于导致责任的行为(或违反义务)的非法性概念,这反映了法律监督在俄罗斯法律体系中的主导地位。但是,在公司行政人员负有责任的情况下,违反信义义务可被视为足以作为将其行为定为非法的理由,而无需特别提及具体的法律规范。关键词:民事责任;公司;企业高管;违法行为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Welfare Models and Community Enterprises: Commons and Sustainable Economy Complexity of Legal Harmonisation in Southeast Asia: A Diversity of Legal Systems & Languages Promoting Effective Refugee Protection in India: Balancing National Interests and International Obligations Legal Assessment of the Condition of Recourse to Domestic Judicial Authorities in the Judicial Procedures of the European Court of Human Rights with a view to the Case of Salahuddin Anju and others v. Turkey Network Analysis and Control System in Mega Projects: The Case of PICASP Erasmus Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1