{"title":"Disability and Precarious Work","authors":"Lisa A. Schur, D. Kruse","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the prevalence, causes, and consequences of precarious work among people with disabilities. New US evidence from the government’s Current Population Survey, and reviews of prior studies, show that workers with disabilities are more likely than those without disabilities to be in precarious jobs. This is explained in part by many people with disabilities choosing precarious jobs due to the flexibility these jobs can provide. Other people with disabilities, however, face prejudice and discrimination in obtaining standard jobs and must resort to taking precarious jobs with less security, lower pay and benefits, little or no training and opportunities for advancement, and few, if any, worker protections. Workers with disabilities tend to have worse outcomes on these measures than workers without disabilities in every type of employment arrangement. The disability pay gap is higher in precarious jobs than in full-time permanent jobs. The mixed evidence suggests that precarious jobs create good employment outcomes for some workers with disabilities but bad outcomes for others. While continued efforts are needed to decrease barriers to traditional employment for people with disabilities, efforts are also needed to bring higher pay and greater legal protections to precarious workers, which would especially benefit workers with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This chapter examines the prevalence, causes, and consequences of precarious work among people with disabilities. New US evidence from the government’s Current Population Survey, and reviews of prior studies, show that workers with disabilities are more likely than those without disabilities to be in precarious jobs. This is explained in part by many people with disabilities choosing precarious jobs due to the flexibility these jobs can provide. Other people with disabilities, however, face prejudice and discrimination in obtaining standard jobs and must resort to taking precarious jobs with less security, lower pay and benefits, little or no training and opportunities for advancement, and few, if any, worker protections. Workers with disabilities tend to have worse outcomes on these measures than workers without disabilities in every type of employment arrangement. The disability pay gap is higher in precarious jobs than in full-time permanent jobs. The mixed evidence suggests that precarious jobs create good employment outcomes for some workers with disabilities but bad outcomes for others. While continued efforts are needed to decrease barriers to traditional employment for people with disabilities, efforts are also needed to bring higher pay and greater legal protections to precarious workers, which would especially benefit workers with disabilities.
本章探讨了残疾人从事不稳定工作的普遍性、原因和后果。来自美国政府当前人口调查(Current Population Survey)的新证据以及对先前研究的回顾表明,残疾工人比非残疾工人更有可能从事不稳定的工作。这在一定程度上是由于许多残疾人选择不稳定的工作,因为这些工作可以提供灵活性。然而,其他残疾人在获得标准工作时面临偏见和歧视,必须从事不稳定的工作,这些工作缺乏保障,工资和福利较低,很少或根本没有培训和晋升机会,而且很少(如果有的话)工人保护。在所有类型的就业安排中,残疾工人在这些措施上的结果往往比没有残疾的工人差。在不稳定的工作中,残疾工资差距高于全职工作。这些混杂的证据表明,不稳定的工作为一些残疾工人创造了良好的就业结果,但对另一些人却产生了不利的结果。虽然需要继续努力减少残疾人传统就业的障碍,但也需要努力为不稳定的工人提供更高的工资和更多的法律保护,这将特别有利于残疾工人。