A Plebeian Lexicon of Capitalism (and Socialism)

Larry Wigger
{"title":"A Plebeian Lexicon of Capitalism (and Socialism)","authors":"Larry Wigger","doi":"10.38024/arpe.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is by no means exaggeration to suggest that society finds itself increasingly ill equipped in the art of civil discourse.  In particular, the realm of political debate has polarized at partisan extremes, arguably fueled by gross economic inequality.  And as is typical when advocates’ hearts are aflame, logic can give way to passion, whether for lack of empathy or failures in communication.  With skirmish lines firmly drawn seeming eons ago, the opposing forces calcify in their trenches, rarely daring set foot on the field of battle, choosing instead to lob poorly calculated mortars at their “enemy,” not in honest attempt to “win” the war, but merely hoping to quiet the shells raining down, even if but temporarily.  Before we can broker peace, it is crucial we mend the broken lines of communication, starting with the most basic building blocks of language.  Of late, our (un)civil discourse has been rife with talking at each other and past each other, without pause to consider the foundational definitions of the words we lob.  We have weaponized our very means of intellectual connection, to the point that what remains is a toxic stew of defensive reactions.  Into this fray author beckons reader, with lofty goals of both deconstructing and then intentionally framing a lay person’s lexicon with useful definitions for capitalism, capitalist, and capital, each considered as relative to socialism.","PeriodicalId":252052,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Political Economy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is by no means exaggeration to suggest that society finds itself increasingly ill equipped in the art of civil discourse.  In particular, the realm of political debate has polarized at partisan extremes, arguably fueled by gross economic inequality.  And as is typical when advocates’ hearts are aflame, logic can give way to passion, whether for lack of empathy or failures in communication.  With skirmish lines firmly drawn seeming eons ago, the opposing forces calcify in their trenches, rarely daring set foot on the field of battle, choosing instead to lob poorly calculated mortars at their “enemy,” not in honest attempt to “win” the war, but merely hoping to quiet the shells raining down, even if but temporarily.  Before we can broker peace, it is crucial we mend the broken lines of communication, starting with the most basic building blocks of language.  Of late, our (un)civil discourse has been rife with talking at each other and past each other, without pause to consider the foundational definitions of the words we lob.  We have weaponized our very means of intellectual connection, to the point that what remains is a toxic stew of defensive reactions.  Into this fray author beckons reader, with lofty goals of both deconstructing and then intentionally framing a lay person’s lexicon with useful definitions for capitalism, capitalist, and capital, each considered as relative to socialism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本主义(和社会主义)的平民词汇
毫不夸张地说,社会发现自己越来越不具备公民话语的艺术。特别是,政治辩论领域已经出现了党派极端的两极化,可以说是由严重的经济不平等推动的。当支持者的心燃烧时,无论是缺乏同理心还是沟通失败,逻辑都会让位于激情,这是典型的。由于冲突线似乎早在很久以前就已经确定下来了,对立双方在战壕中僵化,很少敢踏上战场,而是选择向他们的“敌人”发射计算不周的迫击炮,而不是真诚地试图“赢得”战争,而只是希望平息像雨点一样的炮弹,即使只是暂时的。在我们促成和平之前,从最基本的语言构建块开始,修复断裂的沟通线路是至关重要的。最近,我们的(非)民间话语充斥着互相攻击和互相超越,而没有停下来考虑我们所使用的词语的基本定义。我们已经把我们的智力联系手段武器化了,以至于剩下的只是一堆有毒的防御性反应。在这场争论中,作者向读者发出了召唤,他的崇高目标是解构外行的词汇,然后有意地为资本主义、资本主义和资本主义提供有用的定义,每个定义都被认为是与社会主义相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern Monetary Theory and Energy Conservation: An Institutionalist Approach to Fiscal Policy and Energy Conservation Community-Level Incarceration Rates and the Quality of Local Education Systems in North Carolina When did neoliberalism end? Investing in socio-emotional skills during early childhood to achieve capabilities and fight poverty: overcoming socioeconomic vulnerabilities in Brazil through Criança Feliz (COVID) CRISIS IN A FINANCIALIZED ECONOMY AND ALTERNATIVE REGULATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1