Teaching Law Reform in the 1990s

Jane E. Schukoske
{"title":"Teaching Law Reform in the 1990s","authors":"Jane E. Schukoske","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1425645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advocates for social change, including lawyers and law professors, explicitly inquire into the relationship between theory and practice in law reform efforts. Theory is intentionally used to develop novel legal principles and procedures in an attempt to produce just results. The study of lawyering for social change offers law students an angle other than that of traditional legal education on what they are learning in law school and on lawyering choices. How lawyers design strategies to attempt to bring about social change, how they determine what is good policy, how they develop theories about the appropriate relationship between lawyers and their communities, and how the legal system resists effective social change are important and intriguing inquiries.This article discusses a seminar entitled \"Law and Social Reform.\" This seminar gives students a forum in which to consider the types of change that hey think are desirable, to propose change and strategies for securing it, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a reform effort. After studying law reform efforts from an historical perspective, participants focus on and present their own proposals for law reform. While collaborating with advocates in the community working on the chosen topic, each student writes a paper on a reform idea and the strategy necessary for its attainment. Each participant's paper is carefully supervised in preparation for classroom presentation.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1425645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Advocates for social change, including lawyers and law professors, explicitly inquire into the relationship between theory and practice in law reform efforts. Theory is intentionally used to develop novel legal principles and procedures in an attempt to produce just results. The study of lawyering for social change offers law students an angle other than that of traditional legal education on what they are learning in law school and on lawyering choices. How lawyers design strategies to attempt to bring about social change, how they determine what is good policy, how they develop theories about the appropriate relationship between lawyers and their communities, and how the legal system resists effective social change are important and intriguing inquiries.This article discusses a seminar entitled "Law and Social Reform." This seminar gives students a forum in which to consider the types of change that hey think are desirable, to propose change and strategies for securing it, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a reform effort. After studying law reform efforts from an historical perspective, participants focus on and present their own proposals for law reform. While collaborating with advocates in the community working on the chosen topic, each student writes a paper on a reform idea and the strategy necessary for its attainment. Each participant's paper is carefully supervised in preparation for classroom presentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
90年代的教法改革
包括律师和法学教授在内的社会变革倡导者明确探讨了法律改革工作中理论与实践的关系。理论被有意地用来发展新的法律原则和程序,试图产生公正的结果。社会变革律师的研究为法律学生提供了一个不同于传统法律教育的角度,让他们了解自己在法学院学习的内容和律师的选择。律师如何设计策略来试图带来社会变革,他们如何确定什么是好的政策,他们如何发展关于律师和社区之间适当关系的理论,以及法律制度如何抵制有效的社会变革,这些都是重要而有趣的问题。本文讨论了一个名为“法律与社会改革”的研讨会。这个研讨会为学生提供了一个论坛,让他们考虑他们认为可取的变革类型,提出变革和确保变革的战略,并评估改革努力的有效性。在从历史的角度研究了法律改革的努力之后,与会者关注并提出了自己的法律改革建议。在与所选主题的社区倡导者合作时,每个学生写一篇关于改革理念和实现其所必需的策略的论文。每个参与者的论文都被仔细监督,以准备课堂演讲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lawyer Brain - Transform your Well-being and Develop a Performance Edge The Scholarly Impact Matrix: An Empirical Study of How Multiple Metrics Create an Informed Story of a Scholar's Work Law and Economics Under the Palms: Henry Manne at the University of Miami, 1974–1980 Curriculum Decolonisation and Revisionist Pedagogy of African Customary Law Правовое просвещение, электронная демократия и медиаобразование: основы эффективной интеграции (Legal Education, e-Democracy and Media Education: The Basis of Effective Integration)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1