Evolving in Collaboration: Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Workflows in North Carolina

Mary G. Early, Anne Marie Taber
{"title":"Evolving in Collaboration: Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Workflows in North Carolina","authors":"Mary G. Early, Anne Marie Taber","doi":"10.29087/2010.2.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thirty-seven colleges and universities in North Carolina offer advanced degrees, and most require a thesis or dissertation. The websites of thirteen (35%) indicate they accept or require electronic submission of dissertations and/or theses (ETD). How do these institutions handle the interdepartmental communication and collaboration needs of ETD programs? To begin answering this question, this study examines current practices among ETD administrators in North Carolina and in current national literature, paying special attention to communication, collaboration, workflows, and divisions of labor. The literature review surveys current (since 2003) library and higher education articles on topics related to collaboration, workflows, and divisions of labor in ETD programs. Then the authors use a brief web survey (sixteen questions) that was emailed to twenty-three individuals identified on institutional websites as being involved in the ETD program. Fifty percent of recipients completed the survey, and the results tend to support common themes found in the literature: ETD depositories require a great variety of skill sets and thus will involve multiple departments; libraries and graduate schools are primary players, but not exclusively, in ETD workflows; and communication and collaboration between departments are important from start to finish.","PeriodicalId":114226,"journal":{"name":"Collaborative Librarianship","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaborative Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29087/2010.2.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Thirty-seven colleges and universities in North Carolina offer advanced degrees, and most require a thesis or dissertation. The websites of thirteen (35%) indicate they accept or require electronic submission of dissertations and/or theses (ETD). How do these institutions handle the interdepartmental communication and collaboration needs of ETD programs? To begin answering this question, this study examines current practices among ETD administrators in North Carolina and in current national literature, paying special attention to communication, collaboration, workflows, and divisions of labor. The literature review surveys current (since 2003) library and higher education articles on topics related to collaboration, workflows, and divisions of labor in ETD programs. Then the authors use a brief web survey (sixteen questions) that was emailed to twenty-three individuals identified on institutional websites as being involved in the ETD program. Fifty percent of recipients completed the survey, and the results tend to support common themes found in the literature: ETD depositories require a great variety of skill sets and thus will involve multiple departments; libraries and graduate schools are primary players, but not exclusively, in ETD workflows; and communication and collaboration between departments are important from start to finish.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在协作中发展:电子论文和论文工作流程在北卡罗来纳州
北卡罗莱纳州的37所学院和大学提供高级学位,大多数都要求论文或学位论文。13个(35%)的网站表示他们接受或要求电子提交论文和/或论文(ETD)。这些机构如何处理ETD项目的跨部门沟通和协作需求?为了开始回答这个问题,本研究检查了北卡罗来纳州ETD管理人员的当前实践以及当前的国家文献,特别关注沟通、协作、工作流程和劳动分工。文献综述调查了当前(自2003年以来)图书馆和高等教育中与ETD项目中的协作、工作流和劳动分工相关的主题文章。然后,作者使用一个简短的网络调查(16个问题),通过电子邮件发送给23个在机构网站上确定参与ETD计划的个人。50%的接受者完成了调查,结果倾向于支持文献中发现的共同主题:ETD保管机构需要各种各样的技能组合,因此将涉及多个部门;图书馆和研究生院是ETD工作流程中的主要参与者,但不是唯一的参与者;部门之间的沟通和协作从头到尾都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working Across Disciplines and Library Units to Develop a Suite of Systematic Review Services for Researchers Pressing Forward in Scholarly Communities: Synthesizing Communication Technologies with the Researchers Who Utilize Them Does Virtual Communication Equal Virtual Collaboration? The Influence of Technology on Job Satisfaction and Collaboration The Pivot: Phase 2 of 2CUL Technical Services Integration Planning from the Middle Out: Phase 1 of 2CUL Technical Services Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1