Political Polarization, Income Inequality and Size of Government

S. Akdede, Nazlı Keyifli
{"title":"Political Polarization, Income Inequality and Size of Government","authors":"S. Akdede, Nazlı Keyifli","doi":"10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper empirically investigates the determinants of political polarization. Size of government and income distribution are the main independent variables along with other controlling variables. The statistical analysis uses panel data econometric. The sample of countries includes 57 countries and time period spans between 1990 and 2015. Results of regressions analysis indicates that increased income inequality increases political polarization. Political polarization is derived from World Values Survey (WVS). It is measured as standard deviation of responses to the question “what is role for government”. In addition, results of our empirical indicates that increased government size reduces the political polarization. The paper explains the links for these findings. İt concludes with some policy implications.","PeriodicalId":313557,"journal":{"name":"34. International Public Finance Conference","volume":"27 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34. International Public Finance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates the determinants of political polarization. Size of government and income distribution are the main independent variables along with other controlling variables. The statistical analysis uses panel data econometric. The sample of countries includes 57 countries and time period spans between 1990 and 2015. Results of regressions analysis indicates that increased income inequality increases political polarization. Political polarization is derived from World Values Survey (WVS). It is measured as standard deviation of responses to the question “what is role for government”. In addition, results of our empirical indicates that increased government size reduces the political polarization. The paper explains the links for these findings. İt concludes with some policy implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治两极分化、收入不平等与政府规模
本文对政治两极分化的决定因素进行了实证研究。政府规模和收入分配是主要的自变量,还有其他控制变量。统计分析采用面板数据计量经济学。国家样本包括57个国家,时间跨度从1990年到2015年。回归分析结果表明,收入不平等的加剧加剧了政治两极分化。政治两极分化来源于世界价值观调查(WVS)。它是用对“政府的角色是什么”这个问题的回答的标准差来衡量的。此外,我们的实证结果表明,政府规模的增加减少了政治两极分化。这篇论文解释了这些发现之间的联系。İt总结了一些政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regional Inequalities in European Union and Potential Impacts of European Union Membership Process on Regional Disparities in Turkey An Evaluation on Social State Understanding and Turkey An Analysis on the Relationship Between Fuel Taxes and Fuel Consumption and Current Deficit: a Case of Turkey Characteristics of Plastic Bag Fee and the Evaluation of This Fee by Means of Fiscal and Environmental Policy Financial Analysis of the Political Property of Ni̇zâmül Mülk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1