Report on a scoping review of nursing interventions for young people's psychological wellbeing

James Turner, L. Cooper, Amie Woodward, J. Painter, P. Day, G. Hazelby, D. Harrop, K. Moore
{"title":"Report on a scoping review of nursing interventions for young people's psychological wellbeing","authors":"James Turner, L. Cooper, Amie Woodward, J. Painter, P. Day, G. Hazelby, D. Harrop, K. Moore","doi":"10.12968/chhe.2022.3.2.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a two-part mixed methods scoping project, funded by the RCN Foundation, to review the available evidence and undertake a Delphi study of nurse-led interventions. Nurses in the field were surveyed to understand their role in promoting children and young people's mental health and emotional wellbeing across the UK. A scoping review of the literature was undertaken and a two-part Delphi survey was developed and managed. Results of the literature review were inconclusive. There was a paucity of literature, particularly in the UK, suggesting that nurses may be under-represented in the research seeking to make recommendations concerning their profession. 244 responses to the Delphi method survey were received. Responses confirmed the fundamental importance of the therapeutic relationship. They also suggested that nurse-led pre-crisis and early interventions which addressed the mental health and emotional wellbeing needs of children and young people were being extensively utilised. All countries and all regions appeared to have primarily community-based services. School-based services were perceived to be highly beneficial. Early interventions typically targeted levels of resilience, emotional regulation and the prevention of ongoing mental health problems. Respondents viewed these interventions as effective but often encountered organisational and practical challenges, including access to training and ongoing supervision.","PeriodicalId":354264,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Child Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/chhe.2022.3.2.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports on a two-part mixed methods scoping project, funded by the RCN Foundation, to review the available evidence and undertake a Delphi study of nurse-led interventions. Nurses in the field were surveyed to understand their role in promoting children and young people's mental health and emotional wellbeing across the UK. A scoping review of the literature was undertaken and a two-part Delphi survey was developed and managed. Results of the literature review were inconclusive. There was a paucity of literature, particularly in the UK, suggesting that nurses may be under-represented in the research seeking to make recommendations concerning their profession. 244 responses to the Delphi method survey were received. Responses confirmed the fundamental importance of the therapeutic relationship. They also suggested that nurse-led pre-crisis and early interventions which addressed the mental health and emotional wellbeing needs of children and young people were being extensively utilised. All countries and all regions appeared to have primarily community-based services. School-based services were perceived to be highly beneficial. Early interventions typically targeted levels of resilience, emotional regulation and the prevention of ongoing mental health problems. Respondents viewed these interventions as effective but often encountered organisational and practical challenges, including access to training and ongoing supervision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于青少年心理健康护理干预措施范围审查的报告
本文报告了由RCN基金会资助的两部分混合方法范围界定项目,以审查现有证据并对护士主导的干预措施进行德尔菲研究。该领域的护士接受了调查,以了解她们在促进全英国儿童和青少年心理健康和情感健康方面的作用。对文献进行了范围审查,并开发和管理了两部分德尔菲调查。文献综述的结果尚无定论。文献的缺乏,特别是在英国,表明护士在寻求对其职业提出建议的研究中可能代表性不足。德尔菲法调查共收到244份回复。反应证实了治疗关系的根本重要性。他们还表示,正在广泛利用护士主导的危机前和早期干预措施,解决儿童和年轻人的心理健康和情感健康需求。所有国家和所有区域似乎都主要提供以社区为基础的服务。以学校为基础的服务被认为非常有益。早期干预通常针对恢复能力、情绪调节和预防持续的精神健康问题。受访者认为这些干预措施是有效的,但往往遇到组织和实际挑战,包括获得培训和持续监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mental health crisis: The children and young people waiting years for CAMHS support How dare you say that, how dare you publish that? Online safety: Protecting young people from online abuse Declining health and wellbeing and deteriorating services Allergies: Schools need to be better prepared and equipped
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1