Aquinas’ Balancing Act

Gyula Klima
{"title":"Aquinas’ Balancing Act","authors":"Gyula Klima","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.00022.KLI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn this paper, I will primarily argue for the consistency of Aquinas’ conception, according to which the human\nsoul, uniquely in God’s creation, is both the inherent, material, substantial form of the human body, and the subsistent\nimmaterial substance underlying the immaterial operations of its immaterial, rational powers, namely, intellect and will. In this\ndiscussion, I will point out that typical challenges to Aquinas’ conception usually rely on semantic or ontological assumptions\nthat can plausibly be denied in Aquinas’ own conceptual framework. Since the issue of consistency merely assumes the less than\nself-evident claim of the immateriality of the human intellect, I will also provide a brief sketch of what I take to be Aquinas’\nmost promising proof of this claim.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"29 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.00022.KLI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, I will primarily argue for the consistency of Aquinas’ conception, according to which the human soul, uniquely in God’s creation, is both the inherent, material, substantial form of the human body, and the subsistent immaterial substance underlying the immaterial operations of its immaterial, rational powers, namely, intellect and will. In this discussion, I will point out that typical challenges to Aquinas’ conception usually rely on semantic or ontological assumptions that can plausibly be denied in Aquinas’ own conceptual framework. Since the issue of consistency merely assumes the less than self-evident claim of the immateriality of the human intellect, I will also provide a brief sketch of what I take to be Aquinas’ most promising proof of this claim.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿奎那的平衡法
在本文中,我将主要论证阿奎那概念的一致性,根据这一概念,人类的灵魂,在上帝的创造中是独一无二的,既是人类身体的固有的、物质的、实质性的形式,也是其非物质的、理性的力量(即智力和意志)的非物质运作的存在的物质实体。在这次讨论中,我将指出,对阿奎那概念的典型挑战通常依赖于语义或本体论的假设,而这些假设在阿奎那自己的概念框架中可能被否认。既然一致性的问题仅仅假设了人类智力的非物质性这一不太明显的主张,我也将提供一个我认为是阿奎那对这一主张最有希望的证明的简要概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A late medieval zeitgeist analysis Kritik über Überweg, Cesalli & Hartung (): Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie & Imbach, Schulthess, Cesalli, Imbach, de Libera, Ricklin & Heller (2021): Die Philosophie des Mittelalters Questioning … Arbogast Schmitt Antiochus’ and Cicero’s different theories of memory in the Lucullus Kritik über Flashar (2020): Hellenistische Philosophie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1