Comparative Evaluation Of Gabapentin, Clonidine And Combination Of Both The Drugs To Attenuate The Pressor Response To Direct Laryngoscopy And Intubation.

Sarita Sharma, R. Angral, Anju Jamwal, Kewal Bhanotra
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation Of Gabapentin, Clonidine And Combination Of Both The Drugs To Attenuate The Pressor Response To Direct Laryngoscopy And Intubation.","authors":"Sarita Sharma, R. Angral, Anju Jamwal, Kewal Bhanotra","doi":"10.5580/2c79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of our study was to compare the relative effectiveness of gabapentin and clonidine in attenuation of pressor response to direct laryngoscopy and intubation, and to evaluate the synergistic effect of combination of both drugs.Materials and methods: 120 patients of either sex of age between 20-60 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grade I and II admitted 24 hours before elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia (GA) were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups of 30 patients each: patients received oral 800 mg of gabapentin (group A), 300 μg of clonidine (group B), 400 mg of gabapentin and 150μg of clonidine (group C) and placebo (group D); 60 minutes (min.) prior to induction of anaesthesia. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured before induction, intubation and at 0,1,3,5 and 10 minutes after intubation.Results: Analysis revealed that there was significant rise in HR at 0 minute in all the groups (p<0.05) except in group B. It remained to significant levels in group C and D up to 10 minutes (p<0.001 and p<0.01) but in group A it returned to insignificant level at 3 minutes. There was statistically highly significant rise in SBP, DBP and MAP (p<0.001,p<0.001 and p<0.01) in all the groups except in group A. In group A statistically significant (p<0.001) fall in SBP, DBP and MAP continued up to 10 minutes.Conclusion: Given 60 minutes before induction of GA, oral gabapentin and clonidine in the dose of 800mg and 300μg attenuate the pressor response but gabapentin blunts the increase in arterial blood pressure better than clonidine. The combination of these two drugs in the studied dosage was not effective in attenuating the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"8 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2c79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to compare the relative effectiveness of gabapentin and clonidine in attenuation of pressor response to direct laryngoscopy and intubation, and to evaluate the synergistic effect of combination of both drugs.Materials and methods: 120 patients of either sex of age between 20-60 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grade I and II admitted 24 hours before elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia (GA) were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups of 30 patients each: patients received oral 800 mg of gabapentin (group A), 300 μg of clonidine (group B), 400 mg of gabapentin and 150μg of clonidine (group C) and placebo (group D); 60 minutes (min.) prior to induction of anaesthesia. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured before induction, intubation and at 0,1,3,5 and 10 minutes after intubation.Results: Analysis revealed that there was significant rise in HR at 0 minute in all the groups (p<0.05) except in group B. It remained to significant levels in group C and D up to 10 minutes (p<0.001 and p<0.01) but in group A it returned to insignificant level at 3 minutes. There was statistically highly significant rise in SBP, DBP and MAP (p<0.001,p<0.001 and p<0.01) in all the groups except in group A. In group A statistically significant (p<0.001) fall in SBP, DBP and MAP continued up to 10 minutes.Conclusion: Given 60 minutes before induction of GA, oral gabapentin and clonidine in the dose of 800mg and 300μg attenuate the pressor response but gabapentin blunts the increase in arterial blood pressure better than clonidine. The combination of these two drugs in the studied dosage was not effective in attenuating the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加巴喷丁、可乐定及联合用药对直接喉镜及插管降压反应的比较评价。
背景:本研究的目的是比较加巴喷丁和可乐定在降低直接喉镜检查和插管时的升压反应方面的相对有效性,并评价两种药物联合使用的协同效应。材料和方法:120例年龄在20-60岁之间的美国麻醉学会(ASA) I级和II级患者在择期手术前24小时接受全麻(GA)治疗。将患者随机分为4组,每组30例:患者口服加巴喷丁800 mg (A组)、可乐定300 μg (B组)、加巴喷丁400 mg +可乐定150μg (C组)、安慰剂(D组);麻醉诱导前60分钟(分钟)。分别于诱导、插管前及插管后0、1、3、5、10分钟测定心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)。结果:除b组外,其他各组心率均在0 min显著升高(p<0.05), C、D组心率在10 min仍维持显著水平(p<0.001和p<0.01), A组心率在3 min恢复到不显著水平。除A组外,各组患者收缩压、舒张压、MAP均有极显著升高(p<0.001、p<0.001、p<0.01)。A组患者收缩压、舒张压、MAP持续下降10 min,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:GA诱导前60分钟,加巴喷丁和可乐定分别口服800mg和300μg可减弱血压升高,但加巴喷丁对血压升高的抑制作用优于可乐定。在研究剂量下,这两种药物联合使用对减轻喉镜检查和插管时的升压反应无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury With Laryngeal Mask Airway Unusual Oral Cavity Metastasis From Follicular Carcinoma Of The Thyroid – A Case Report Efficacy of Ephedrine Versus Lignocaine Pretreatment In Preventing Pain Following Propofol Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. Cesarean Section of a 25 3/7 Week Parturient with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: A Case Report Magill Forceps- An Aid For Difficult Intubation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1