Rope procedures for extraction and insertion of persons used by helicopter emergency medical service

P. Kaľavský, R. Rozenberg, P. Petríček, V. Socha, L. Socha
{"title":"Rope procedures for extraction and insertion of persons used by helicopter emergency medical service","authors":"P. Kaľavský, R. Rozenberg, P. Petríček, V. Socha, L. Socha","doi":"10.13164/CONF.READ.2018.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the issue of alternative ways of extraction and insertion of persons by helicopters using rope and non-rope procedures. The article provides a current general overview of rope and non-rope procedures for insertion of persons in places where a helicopter cannot touch down, as well as an overview of techniques used for extraction/transport of persons from places not permitting helicopter touchdown. The article lists advantages and disadvantages of individual methods and their applicability in the helicopter emergency medical service. The main contribution of the article is the comparison of time indicators when inserting and transporting persons by helicopters with the use of rope procedures during typical model situations. For the purposes of comparing rope procedures have been created three typical model situations for inserting two persons from a hovering helicopter and two typical model situations for extracting four persons and their transportation on board. During creating these model situations, we have taken into consideration the most frequently used rope procedures within HEMS in civil, military and police sectors of the Slovak Republic. Total insertion/extraction time was considered the basic piece of data for the comparison. Time data were obtained from flight tests, actual training, technical documentation data and on the basis of the expert estimate. Rope procedures were compared among each other and among three types of helicopters most used for these purposes in the Slovak Republic: Mi-17 LPZS, Bell-429 and AGUSTA A109K2. Processed conclusions from the comparison of each model situation within the considered alternative rope ways of extraction and insertion of persons by helicopters and the conclusions drawn from the performance comparison of HEMS helicopters in the Slovak Republic within these model situations are a significant contribution to the determination of procedures in the framework of rescue missions.","PeriodicalId":340623,"journal":{"name":"13th Research and Education in Aircraft Design: Conference proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"13th Research and Education in Aircraft Design: Conference proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13164/CONF.READ.2018.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of alternative ways of extraction and insertion of persons by helicopters using rope and non-rope procedures. The article provides a current general overview of rope and non-rope procedures for insertion of persons in places where a helicopter cannot touch down, as well as an overview of techniques used for extraction/transport of persons from places not permitting helicopter touchdown. The article lists advantages and disadvantages of individual methods and their applicability in the helicopter emergency medical service. The main contribution of the article is the comparison of time indicators when inserting and transporting persons by helicopters with the use of rope procedures during typical model situations. For the purposes of comparing rope procedures have been created three typical model situations for inserting two persons from a hovering helicopter and two typical model situations for extracting four persons and their transportation on board. During creating these model situations, we have taken into consideration the most frequently used rope procedures within HEMS in civil, military and police sectors of the Slovak Republic. Total insertion/extraction time was considered the basic piece of data for the comparison. Time data were obtained from flight tests, actual training, technical documentation data and on the basis of the expert estimate. Rope procedures were compared among each other and among three types of helicopters most used for these purposes in the Slovak Republic: Mi-17 LPZS, Bell-429 and AGUSTA A109K2. Processed conclusions from the comparison of each model situation within the considered alternative rope ways of extraction and insertion of persons by helicopters and the conclusions drawn from the performance comparison of HEMS helicopters in the Slovak Republic within these model situations are a significant contribution to the determination of procedures in the framework of rescue missions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直升机紧急医疗服务所使用的人员撤离和插入绳索程序
本文讨论了直升机使用绳索和非绳索程序提取和插入人员的替代方法的问题。这篇文章提供了目前在直升机不能降落的地方用绳索和非绳索将人员插入的一般概述,以及从不允许直升机降落的地方提取/运送人员的技术概述。本文列举了各种方法的优缺点及其在直升机应急医疗服务中的适用性。本文的主要贡献是在典型的模型情况下,用直升机插入和运送人员与使用绳索程序的时间指标的比较。为了比较绳索程序,创建了从悬停直升机上插入两个人的三个典型模型情况和从直升机上取出四个人及其运输的两个典型模型情况。在创建这些模型情况时,我们考虑了斯洛伐克共和国民事,军事和警察部门HEMS中最常用的绳索程序。总插入/提取时间被认为是比较的基本数据。时间数据是根据飞行试验、实际训练、技术文件数据和专家估计获得的。绳索程序彼此之间以及斯洛伐克共和国最常用的三种直升机:Mi-17 LPZS、Bell-429和AGUSTA A109K2之间进行了比较。在考虑的直升机撤离和插入人员的备选绳索方式中,从每个模型情况的比较中得出的处理结论,以及从斯洛伐克共和国HEMS直升机在这些模型情况下的性能比较中得出的结论,对确定救援任务框架内的程序作出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simple universal nonlinear longitudinal flight simulation with avoiding of static and dynamic stability derivatives Diagnostic parameters determination of aircraft hydraulic system Modelling of health monitoring signals and detection areas for aerospace structures Composite aircraft joint experimental testing with digital image correlation Verification and numerical simulation of advanced composite inlet in compliance of airworthiness impact requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1