Word-Level Sequential Memory Abstraction for Model Checking

Per Bjesse
{"title":"Word-Level Sequential Memory Abstraction for Model Checking","authors":"Per Bjesse","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many designs intermingle large memories with wide data paths and nontrivial control. Verifying such systems is challenging, and users often get little traction when applying model checking to decide full or partial end-to-end correctness of such designs. Interestingly, a subclass of these systems can be proven correct by reasoning only about a small number of the memory entries at a limited number of time points. In this paper, we leverage this fact to abstract certain memories in a sound way, and we demonstrate how our memory abstraction coupled with an abstraction refinement algorithm can be used to prove correctness properties for three challenging designs from industry and academia. Key features of our approach are that we operate on standard safety property verification problems, that we proceed completely automatically without any need for abstraction hints, that we can use any bit-level model checker as a back-end decision procedure, and that our algorithms fit seamlessly into a standard transformational verification paradigm.","PeriodicalId":399042,"journal":{"name":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2008.ECP.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Many designs intermingle large memories with wide data paths and nontrivial control. Verifying such systems is challenging, and users often get little traction when applying model checking to decide full or partial end-to-end correctness of such designs. Interestingly, a subclass of these systems can be proven correct by reasoning only about a small number of the memory entries at a limited number of time points. In this paper, we leverage this fact to abstract certain memories in a sound way, and we demonstrate how our memory abstraction coupled with an abstraction refinement algorithm can be used to prove correctness properties for three challenging designs from industry and academia. Key features of our approach are that we operate on standard safety property verification problems, that we proceed completely automatically without any need for abstraction hints, that we can use any bit-level model checker as a back-end decision procedure, and that our algorithms fit seamlessly into a standard transformational verification paradigm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于模型检查的字级顺序内存抽象
许多设计将大内存与宽数据路径和非平凡控制混合在一起。验证这样的系统是具有挑战性的,并且当应用模型检查来决定这种设计的全部或部分端到端正确性时,用户通常很少得到牵引力。有趣的是,这些系统的一个子类可以通过在有限的时间点上对少量内存条目进行推理来证明是正确的。在本文中,我们利用这一事实以一种合理的方式抽象某些记忆,并演示了我们的记忆抽象与抽象优化算法如何用于证明来自工业界和学术界的三个具有挑战性的设计的正确性。我们方法的主要特点是我们在标准的安全属性验证问题上操作,我们完全自动地进行而不需要任何抽象提示,我们可以使用任何位级模型检查器作为后端决策过程,并且我们的算法无缝地适合标准的转换验证范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BACH : Bounded ReAchability CHecker for Linear Hybrid Automata Invited Tutorial: Considerations in the Design and Verification of Microprocessors for Safety-Critical and Security-Critical Applications Trading-Off SAT Search and Variable Quantifications for Effective Unbounded Model Checking Augmenting a Regular Expression-Based Temporal Logic with Local Variables A Temporal Language for SystemC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1