Performance Analysis of Network Selection Using ELECTRE Method

{"title":"Performance Analysis of Network Selection Using ELECTRE Method","authors":"","doi":"10.46632/daai/1/1/11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this type of networks, overall network stability, utilization of resources, User satisfaction and most conducive to quality of service and selecting a Trusted access network (AN) is network in HWN (ANS) paper Proposes plan proposed project user,\nCan consider operator and/or quos perspectives general multicriteria software assistant (SA) was used to present and design. In imperfect wireless networks Bayesian information on the network selection problem we make it a game. Generally, a\nmobile user's preference (i.e., usage) is personal information. Therefore, each user provides others an optimal network selection decision must be made. Bayesian Nash equilibrium is assumed to be the solution of this game, also between the Bayesian Nash equilibrium and the equilibrium distribution of aggregate dynamics there is a one-to-one mapping. This is a Bayesian network selection game Integration of overall optimal response dynamics Numerical results. Show that Referring to the notification, the current paper is called Exams presents a review on the application of MCDM to determine the best PC architecture among three PC architectures, i.e.: A, B&C using ELECTRE technique based on four criteria. Provides a dynamic response to the problem. Henceforth this strategy is incorporated in this study. Arrangements obtained by AHP and ELECTRE technique are considered in the present study. Alternatives (eg wireless networks) represent attributes such as Network Selection 1, Network Selection 2, Network Selection 3, Network Selection 4, and Network Selection 5. Delay (msec), Jitter (msec), BER (• 10), Throughput (kbps), Cost (units) is an evaluation method. In this type of analysis, Gray Correlation Analysis (GRA) methods determine the best solution for a short distance to negativity and a long distance to solution. As a result, Wireless Network 5 ranked first and Wireless Network 4 ranked lowest.","PeriodicalId":226827,"journal":{"name":"Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/daai/1/1/11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this type of networks, overall network stability, utilization of resources, User satisfaction and most conducive to quality of service and selecting a Trusted access network (AN) is network in HWN (ANS) paper Proposes plan proposed project user, Can consider operator and/or quos perspectives general multicriteria software assistant (SA) was used to present and design. In imperfect wireless networks Bayesian information on the network selection problem we make it a game. Generally, a mobile user's preference (i.e., usage) is personal information. Therefore, each user provides others an optimal network selection decision must be made. Bayesian Nash equilibrium is assumed to be the solution of this game, also between the Bayesian Nash equilibrium and the equilibrium distribution of aggregate dynamics there is a one-to-one mapping. This is a Bayesian network selection game Integration of overall optimal response dynamics Numerical results. Show that Referring to the notification, the current paper is called Exams presents a review on the application of MCDM to determine the best PC architecture among three PC architectures, i.e.: A, B&C using ELECTRE technique based on four criteria. Provides a dynamic response to the problem. Henceforth this strategy is incorporated in this study. Arrangements obtained by AHP and ELECTRE technique are considered in the present study. Alternatives (eg wireless networks) represent attributes such as Network Selection 1, Network Selection 2, Network Selection 3, Network Selection 4, and Network Selection 5. Delay (msec), Jitter (msec), BER (• 10), Throughput (kbps), Cost (units) is an evaluation method. In this type of analysis, Gray Correlation Analysis (GRA) methods determine the best solution for a short distance to negativity and a long distance to solution. As a result, Wireless Network 5 ranked first and Wireless Network 4 ranked lowest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ELECTRE方法的网络选择性能分析
在这种类型的网络中,网络的整体稳定性、资源利用率、用户满意度和最有利于服务质量的选择是可信接入网(AN),在HWN (ANS)网络中,论文提出了方案,提出了用户方案,可以考虑运营商和/或用户的角度,通用多准则软件助手(SA)被用来提出和设计。在不完全无线网络中,我们把贝叶斯信息对网络的选择问题当作一个博弈。一般来说,移动用户的偏好(即使用)是个人信息。因此,每个用户必须为其他用户提供最优的网络选择决策。假定贝叶斯纳什均衡是该博弈的解,并且贝叶斯纳什均衡与总体动态均衡分布之间存在一一对应关系。这是一个贝叶斯网络选择博弈整合整体最优响应动力学的数值结果。参考通知,当前的论文称为“考试”,介绍了MCDM的应用,以确定三种PC架构中最好的PC架构,即:a, B&C使用ELECTRE技术基于四个标准。提供对问题的动态响应。因此,这一战略被纳入本研究。在本研究中考虑了AHP和ELECTRE技术得到的排列。备选方案(例如无线网络)表示诸如网络选择1、网络选择2、网络选择3、网络选择4和网络选择5等属性。时延(msec)、抖动(msec)、误码率(•10)、吞吐量(kbps)、成本(单位)是一种评估方法。在这种类型的分析中,灰色关联分析(GRA)方法确定了短距离到负性和长距离到解的最佳解决方案。因此,无线网络5排名第一,无线网络4排名最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart Home Automation Digital Assistant for Video KYC Framework in India Enhancing House Price Predictability: A Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Real Estate and Policy Decision-Making Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Hate Speech Detection in Online Content Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy Using KNN & SVM Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1