Comparison of identification protocols of a static hysteresis model

M. Longhitano, F. Sixdenier, R. Scorretti, C. Geuzaine, F. Henrotte, L. Krähenbühl
{"title":"Comparison of identification protocols of a static hysteresis model","authors":"M. Longhitano, F. Sixdenier, R. Scorretti, C. Geuzaine, F. Henrotte, L. Krähenbühl","doi":"10.1109/COMPUMAG45669.2019.9032825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to predict magnetic quantities in the magnetic cores of electrical devices, scientists and engineers need hysteresis models sufficiently accurate. Whatever the chosen model, a parameter identification protocol has to be elaborated requiring specific material measurements. This article compares two parameter identification protocols for the same hysteresis model. The protocols, their input and output data, and their accuracy are described in detail and discussed.","PeriodicalId":317315,"journal":{"name":"2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPUMAG45669.2019.9032825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to predict magnetic quantities in the magnetic cores of electrical devices, scientists and engineers need hysteresis models sufficiently accurate. Whatever the chosen model, a parameter identification protocol has to be elaborated requiring specific material measurements. This article compares two parameter identification protocols for the same hysteresis model. The protocols, their input and output data, and their accuracy are described in detail and discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静态迟滞模型识别协议的比较
为了预测电子器件磁芯中的磁量,科学家和工程师需要足够精确的磁滞模型。无论选择何种模型,都必须制定参数识别协议,要求进行具体的材料测量。本文对同一迟滞模型的两种参数识别协议进行了比较。对协议、输入输出数据及其准确性进行了详细的描述和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder to Magnetic Circuit Design with Magnetic Field Computation Modeling of Magnetic Pickups for Electric Musical Instruments Fast Methods for Speeding up the Induction Machine Simulation Modelling Demagnetized Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators using Permeance Network Model with Variable Flux Sources Tree gauging in lossy high frequency FEM models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1