Stakeholders’ views on the Swiss draft ordinances on medical devices

{"title":"Stakeholders’ views on the Swiss draft ordinances on medical devices","authors":"","doi":"10.54920/scto.2019.rawatch.2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To provide our readers with a good forecast of the changes ahead, the RA Watch editorial team asked different representatives – of the ethics committees umbrella organisation, the industry, and the SCTO network of CTUs – their views about the two ordinances proposed for consultation by the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Their views and opinions refer to the drafted versions of the Medical Devices Ordinance (MedDO) and the ordinance on clinical trials for medical devices (ClinO-MD) as open to comments on 15 May 2019.","PeriodicalId":419230,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Affairs Watch","volume":"47 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Affairs Watch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54920/scto.2019.rawatch.2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To provide our readers with a good forecast of the changes ahead, the RA Watch editorial team asked different representatives – of the ethics committees umbrella organisation, the industry, and the SCTO network of CTUs – their views about the two ordinances proposed for consultation by the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Their views and opinions refer to the drafted versions of the Medical Devices Ordinance (MedDO) and the ordinance on clinical trials for medical devices (ClinO-MD) as open to comments on 15 May 2019.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对瑞士医疗器械条例草案的看法
为了让我们的读者对未来的变化有一个良好的预测,RA观察编辑团队询问了不同的代表-道德委员会的总组织,行业和ctu的SCTO网络-他们对联邦公共卫生局(FOPH)提出的两项条例的意见。他们的意见及意见是指于2019年5月15日公开征求意见的《医疗仪器条例》(MedDO)及《医疗仪器临床试验条例》(ClinO-MD)草拟本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The PES-SLEEP project: A practical approach to the categorisation challenge for studies with medical devices Challenges facing Switzerland’s medical technology industry following the 2021 changes to medical device legislation Swissmedic’s experience with the regulatory changes for clinical investigations with medical devices implemented in 2021 Patient input into medical device development: A missed opportunity Regulatory developments in the medical devices sector: A long and difficult journey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1