A State Legitimation Approach of Reserved Built Environment Professional Work - A Case for South Africa – Part 1

T. E. Manchidi, P. Rwelamila
{"title":"A State Legitimation Approach of Reserved Built Environment Professional Work - A Case for South Africa – Part 1","authors":"T. E. Manchidi, P. Rwelamila","doi":"10.15641/JCBM.3.2.740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper borrows from the lenses of the sociology of professions, sociology of science and temporary project organisations and construction reform to examine state legitimation of reserved built environment (BE) professional work as the first part of a two-part study. In doing so, it examines the growth of professions as a consequence of the division of expert labour evolving to fill in knowledge gaps created by emergent social forces as other knowledge areas are rendered less relevant. It shows how professional work negatively impacts on the delivery efficiencies in the project as a temporary organisation. In making this argument, it draws on the jurisdictional theory of professions to illustrate the relational and interactional relationship of professions in construction projects. To help focus on collaboration, a preliminary conceptual model for the legitimation of professions at the macro (policy) level is developed to explain how boundary margins keep professions relational, and how the dynamics of boundary work unfold in a territorial space in a project (meso) environment. Finally, it provides the scope of the second part of the study (the field study) by formulating the main research objective and research question and their respective specific research objectives and research questions, respectively. \nKeywords: Built Environment Professions, Division of Expert Labour, Jurisdictional Boundaries, Legitimation, Professional Work, Temporary Organisations","PeriodicalId":149221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Construction Business and Management","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Construction Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15641/JCBM.3.2.740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper borrows from the lenses of the sociology of professions, sociology of science and temporary project organisations and construction reform to examine state legitimation of reserved built environment (BE) professional work as the first part of a two-part study. In doing so, it examines the growth of professions as a consequence of the division of expert labour evolving to fill in knowledge gaps created by emergent social forces as other knowledge areas are rendered less relevant. It shows how professional work negatively impacts on the delivery efficiencies in the project as a temporary organisation. In making this argument, it draws on the jurisdictional theory of professions to illustrate the relational and interactional relationship of professions in construction projects. To help focus on collaboration, a preliminary conceptual model for the legitimation of professions at the macro (policy) level is developed to explain how boundary margins keep professions relational, and how the dynamics of boundary work unfold in a territorial space in a project (meso) environment. Finally, it provides the scope of the second part of the study (the field study) by formulating the main research objective and research question and their respective specific research objectives and research questions, respectively. Keywords: Built Environment Professions, Division of Expert Labour, Jurisdictional Boundaries, Legitimation, Professional Work, Temporary Organisations
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留建筑环境专业工作的国家合法化途径——以南非为例——第一部分
本文从专业社会学、科学社会学和临时项目组织与建设改革的视角出发,考察了预留建筑环境(BE)专业工作的国家合法性,作为两部分研究的第一部分。在此过程中,它考察了专业的增长,因为专家劳动分工的发展填补了新兴社会力量造成的知识空白,因为其他知识领域变得不那么相关。它显示了作为临时组织的专业工作如何对项目的交付效率产生负面影响。在提出这一论点时,它借鉴了专业的管辖权理论来说明建设项目中专业的关系和相互作用关系。为了帮助专注于合作,在宏观(政策)层面上开发了一个初步的职业合法化概念模型,以解释边界边界如何保持职业关系,以及边界工作的动态如何在项目(中观)环境中的领土空间中展开。最后,通过制定主要研究目标和研究问题,以及各自的具体研究目标和研究问题,提供了第二部分研究(实地研究)的范围。关键词:建筑环境专业,专家分工,管辖边界,合法化,专业工作,临时组织
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Awareness and Barriers to the Application of Lean Construction Techniques in Kano State, Nigeria Sustainable Construction Transition (SCT) Policy Regime in Kenya A Measure of Combustion-Generated Pollutants in University Laboratories and their Effects on the Indoor Air Quality Contributing Elements and Issues to Strategic Management in the Construction Industry Among Small and Medium Enterprises: A Case Study in South Africa's eThekwini Region Evaluation of compliance of concreting materials to standards in building projects in Lagos State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1