The long wait: A discussion of emergency department wait time and its impact on clinical outcomes

M. Sultan
{"title":"The long wait: A discussion of emergency department wait time and its impact on clinical outcomes","authors":"M. Sultan","doi":"10.15273/dmj.vol49no1.11638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A trip to any emergency department (ED) across the country is usually associated with long wait times that can sometimes stretch over a full day or a night. Recently, wait times have been increasing to a distressing rate and emergency medicine teams having been sounding the alarms. Despite the growing population and the increased demand on emergency departments due to the extreme shortage of family physicians, emergency medicine remains under serviced1. While doctors, nurses and the entire interprofessional health team continue to deliver their best efforts to care for patients in timely matter, the lack of resources and space hurdle their efforts. The impact of ED wait times begins with a concerning percentage of patients leaving without being seen by a healthcare team member. A cohort study from the major emergency departments in Ontario showed that 4.2% of patient visiting EDs across Ontario between 2003-2007 left without being seen2. The same study showed that longer wait times were associated with higher risk of adverse events and/or being admitted to the hospital. Depending on the acuity of the presentation, wait times can vary significantly with higher acuity patients typically seen sooner. However, resources do not exist to monitor patients’ conditions during extended wait times, and changes in acuity have become an increasing issue. Finally, the location of emergency departments contributes to different wait times. A retrospective study of wait times in rural and urban EDs in Ontario revealed that rural emergency departments tend to have shorter wait times3. However, it is important to highlight that large urban centers regularly receive higher acuity transfers from smaller rural EDs which contribute to increasing wait times. Several strategies have been proposed to reduce wait times in EDs. These strategies have been mostly focused on increasing the capacity, decreasing wait time for results after intake and decreasing intake. Several trials across the country showed some degrees of success of these strategies including introduction of satellite health clinics for patients returning to the ED for follow up in British Columbia4. A similar study conducted in Saskatchewan showed a positive impact of the reduction of physician reassessment time on wait times in the ED5. Finally, a study by Wong et al. showed that many patients prefer to access after-hours family medicine practices over EDs, therefore reducing the demand of patients with lower acuity presentation on EDs6. Despite these proposed solutions, wait times continue to increase in EDs across the country. The response to this demand continues to fall short and a system-wide solution is increasingly needed to enhance patient outcome and prevent physician burnout.","PeriodicalId":293977,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol49no1.11638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A trip to any emergency department (ED) across the country is usually associated with long wait times that can sometimes stretch over a full day or a night. Recently, wait times have been increasing to a distressing rate and emergency medicine teams having been sounding the alarms. Despite the growing population and the increased demand on emergency departments due to the extreme shortage of family physicians, emergency medicine remains under serviced1. While doctors, nurses and the entire interprofessional health team continue to deliver their best efforts to care for patients in timely matter, the lack of resources and space hurdle their efforts. The impact of ED wait times begins with a concerning percentage of patients leaving without being seen by a healthcare team member. A cohort study from the major emergency departments in Ontario showed that 4.2% of patient visiting EDs across Ontario between 2003-2007 left without being seen2. The same study showed that longer wait times were associated with higher risk of adverse events and/or being admitted to the hospital. Depending on the acuity of the presentation, wait times can vary significantly with higher acuity patients typically seen sooner. However, resources do not exist to monitor patients’ conditions during extended wait times, and changes in acuity have become an increasing issue. Finally, the location of emergency departments contributes to different wait times. A retrospective study of wait times in rural and urban EDs in Ontario revealed that rural emergency departments tend to have shorter wait times3. However, it is important to highlight that large urban centers regularly receive higher acuity transfers from smaller rural EDs which contribute to increasing wait times. Several strategies have been proposed to reduce wait times in EDs. These strategies have been mostly focused on increasing the capacity, decreasing wait time for results after intake and decreasing intake. Several trials across the country showed some degrees of success of these strategies including introduction of satellite health clinics for patients returning to the ED for follow up in British Columbia4. A similar study conducted in Saskatchewan showed a positive impact of the reduction of physician reassessment time on wait times in the ED5. Finally, a study by Wong et al. showed that many patients prefer to access after-hours family medicine practices over EDs, therefore reducing the demand of patients with lower acuity presentation on EDs6. Despite these proposed solutions, wait times continue to increase in EDs across the country. The response to this demand continues to fall short and a system-wide solution is increasingly needed to enhance patient outcome and prevent physician burnout.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
漫长的等待:讨论急诊科等待时间及其对临床结果的影响
去全国各地的任何急诊科(ED)通常都要等待很长时间,有时可能要等一整天或一个晚上。最近,等待时间增加到令人痛心的程度,紧急医疗小组一直在拉响警报。尽管人口不断增长,而且由于家庭医生的极度短缺,对急诊科的需求也在增加,但急诊医学仍然供不应求。虽然医生、护士和整个跨专业医疗团队继续尽最大努力及时照顾病人,但资源和空间的缺乏阻碍了他们的努力。急诊科等待时间的影响开始于患者在没有医疗团队成员看到的情况下离开的比例。一项来自安大略省主要急诊科的队列研究表明,2003-2007年期间,在安大略省急诊科就诊的患者中,有4.2%没有得到诊治就离开了。同样的研究表明,等待时间越长,不良事件和/或住院的风险越高。视患者的视敏程度而定,等待时间有很大差异,视敏程度越高的患者通常越早就诊。然而,在延长的等待时间内,没有资源来监测患者的病情,并且敏锐度的变化已经成为一个日益严重的问题。最后,急诊科的位置导致等待时间不同。一项对安大略省农村和城市急诊科等待时间的回顾性研究显示,农村急诊科的等待时间往往更短。然而,重要的是要强调,大型城市中心经常从较小的农村急诊科获得更高的急症转移,这有助于增加等待时间。已经提出了几种策略来减少急诊室的等待时间。这些策略主要集中在增加容量,减少摄入后等待结果的时间和减少摄入。全国各地的几项试验表明,这些策略在一定程度上取得了成功,包括在不列颠哥伦比亚省为返回急诊科进行随访的患者引入卫星健康诊所。在萨斯喀彻温省进行的一项类似研究表明,减少医生重新评估时间对ED5的等待时间有积极影响。最后,Wong等人的一项研究表明,许多患者更愿意接受非工作时间的家庭医学实践,而不是急诊科,因此减少了对急诊科低视力患者的需求6。尽管提出了这些解决方案,全国急诊科的等待时间仍在增加。对这一需求的回应仍然不足,越来越需要一个全系统的解决方案来提高患者的结果和防止医生倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hackathons within medical education: Promoting cutting-edge innovation in surgery The association between gestational age at delivery and neonatal abstinence syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Two for the price of one: The benefits of job sharing to increase women representation in surgical specialties Cutting edge hackathon competition winners strive to better support more surgeons with primary childcare responsibilities A discussion of contemporary platforms for women in surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1