Early Warning Systems - Using PTA Analysis of DFITs to Understand Complex Hydraulic Fractures and Optimize Treatment Designs

A. K. Nicholson, R. Hawkes, R. Bachman
{"title":"Early Warning Systems - Using PTA Analysis of DFITs to Understand Complex Hydraulic Fractures and Optimize Treatment Designs","authors":"A. K. Nicholson, R. Hawkes, R. Bachman","doi":"10.2118/196194-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper outlines methods to characterize hydraulic fracture geometry and optimize full-scale treatments using knowledge gained from Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFITs) in settings where fracturing pressures are at or above the overburden gradient.\n Hydraulic fractures, whether created during a DFIT or a larger scale treatment, are usually represented by vertical plane fracture models. These models work well in a relatively normal stress regime with homogeneous rock fabric where fracturing pressure is less than the Overburden (OB) pressure. However, many hydraulic fracture treatments are pumped above the OB pressure. This high pressure may be caused by near well friction or tortuosity but may also be the result of more complex fractures in multiple planes.\n Bachman et al (2012, 2015), Hawkes et al (2018) and Nicholson et al (2019) advanced DFIT analysis by using the Pressure Transient Analysis (PTA) technique. This allows the identification of flow regimes useful for understanding fracture geometry and closure behavior beyond that available from more familiar G-function analysis techniques. In this paper DFITs from the Duvernay, Montney, Rock Creek and Cardium formations of Western Canada are analyzed using the PTA method. Particular attention is given to Early-Time Flow Regimes (ETFRs) present between the end of pump shut-down (End of Job Instantaneous Shut-In Pressure, EOJ ISIP) and the 3/2-slope Nolte flow regime. Identification of pressure gradients at the start and end of these flow regimes is of vital importance to the interpretation process. This allows the authors to build on case histories of DFIT-derived fracture geometry interpretations presented in Nicholson et al (2017, 2019).\n Procedures are proposed for picking Farfield Fracture Extension Pressure (FFEP) in place of conventional IIP estimates while distinguishing between storage, friction and tortuosity vs. fracture geometry indicators. Analysis of FFEP and ETFRs combined with the context of rock fabric and stress setting are useful for designing full-scale fracturing operations. A DFIT may help identify potentially problematic multi-plane fractures, predict high fracturing pressures or screen-outs. Fluid and completion system designs, well placement and orientation may be adjusted to mitigate some of these effects using the intelligence gained from the DFIT early warning system.","PeriodicalId":325107,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196194-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper outlines methods to characterize hydraulic fracture geometry and optimize full-scale treatments using knowledge gained from Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFITs) in settings where fracturing pressures are at or above the overburden gradient. Hydraulic fractures, whether created during a DFIT or a larger scale treatment, are usually represented by vertical plane fracture models. These models work well in a relatively normal stress regime with homogeneous rock fabric where fracturing pressure is less than the Overburden (OB) pressure. However, many hydraulic fracture treatments are pumped above the OB pressure. This high pressure may be caused by near well friction or tortuosity but may also be the result of more complex fractures in multiple planes. Bachman et al (2012, 2015), Hawkes et al (2018) and Nicholson et al (2019) advanced DFIT analysis by using the Pressure Transient Analysis (PTA) technique. This allows the identification of flow regimes useful for understanding fracture geometry and closure behavior beyond that available from more familiar G-function analysis techniques. In this paper DFITs from the Duvernay, Montney, Rock Creek and Cardium formations of Western Canada are analyzed using the PTA method. Particular attention is given to Early-Time Flow Regimes (ETFRs) present between the end of pump shut-down (End of Job Instantaneous Shut-In Pressure, EOJ ISIP) and the 3/2-slope Nolte flow regime. Identification of pressure gradients at the start and end of these flow regimes is of vital importance to the interpretation process. This allows the authors to build on case histories of DFIT-derived fracture geometry interpretations presented in Nicholson et al (2017, 2019). Procedures are proposed for picking Farfield Fracture Extension Pressure (FFEP) in place of conventional IIP estimates while distinguishing between storage, friction and tortuosity vs. fracture geometry indicators. Analysis of FFEP and ETFRs combined with the context of rock fabric and stress setting are useful for designing full-scale fracturing operations. A DFIT may help identify potentially problematic multi-plane fractures, predict high fracturing pressures or screen-outs. Fluid and completion system designs, well placement and orientation may be adjusted to mitigate some of these effects using the intelligence gained from the DFIT early warning system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期预警系统-使用PTA分析dfit来了解复杂水力裂缝并优化处理设计
本文概述了在压裂压力等于或高于覆盖层梯度的情况下,利用诊断裂缝注入测试(DFITs)获得的知识,表征水力裂缝几何形状并优化全尺寸处理的方法。水力裂缝,无论是在DFIT还是更大规模的压裂过程中产生的,通常都用垂直平面裂缝模型来表示。这些模型在相对正常的应力状态下工作良好,具有均匀的岩石组构,压裂压力小于上覆岩层压力。然而,许多水力压裂作业的泵送压力都高于OB压力。这种高压可能是由井附近的摩擦或弯曲引起的,但也可能是多个平面上更复杂裂缝的结果。Bachman等人(2012、2015)、Hawkes等人(2018)和Nicholson等人(2019)利用压力瞬态分析(PTA)技术改进了DFIT分析。这使得识别流动状态对理解裂缝几何形状和闭合行为非常有用,而不是使用更熟悉的g函数分析技术。本文采用PTA方法对加拿大西部Duvernay、Montney、Rock Creek和Cardium地层的dfit进行了分析。特别要注意的是,在泵关闭结束(作业结束瞬时关井压力,EOJ ISIP)和3/2斜率Nolte流动状态之间存在的早期流动状态(etfr)。确定这些流型开始和结束时的压力梯度对解释过程至关重要。这使得作者可以建立在Nicholson等人(2017,2019)提出的基于dfit的裂缝几何解释的案例历史上。提出了选取远场裂缝延伸压力(FFEP)的方法,以取代传统的IIP估计,同时区分存储、摩擦和弯曲度与裂缝几何指标。结合岩石组构和应力环境对FFEP和etfr进行分析,有助于设计全面的压裂作业。DFIT可以帮助识别潜在的多平面裂缝问题,预测高压裂压力或筛出。利用DFIT早期预警系统的信息,可以调整流体和完井系统的设计、井位和定向,以减轻这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cluster Flow Identification During Multi-Rate Testing Using a Wireline Tractor Conveyed Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing System With Engineered Fiber on a HPHT Horizontal Unconventional Gas Producer in the Liard Basin Reservoir Characterization-Geostatistical Modeling of the Paleocene Zelten Carbonate Reservoir. Case study: Meghil Field, Sirte Basin, Libya Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Onset of Liquid Accumulation in Large- Diameter Deviated Gas Wells Applying Decision Trees to Improve Decision Quality in Unconventional Resource Development A Utica Case Study: The Impact of Permeability Estimates on History Matching, Fracture Length, and Well Spacing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1