Feature and decision level fusion for action recognition

M. Abouelenien, Yiwen Wan, Abdullah N. Saudagar
{"title":"Feature and decision level fusion for action recognition","authors":"M. Abouelenien, Yiwen Wan, Abdullah N. Saudagar","doi":"10.1109/ICCCNT.2012.6477851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification of actions by human actors from video enables new technologies in diverse areas such as surveillance and content-based retrieval. We propose and evaluate alternative models, one based on feature-level fusion and the second on decision-level fusion. Both models employ direct classification - inferring from low-level features the nature of the action. Interesting points are assumed to have salient 3D (spatial plus temporal) gradients that distinguish them from their neighborhoods. They are identified using three distinct 3D interesting-point detectors. Each detected interest point set is represented as a bag-of-words descriptor. The feature level fusion model concatenates descriptors subsequently used as input to a classifier. The decision level fusion uses an ensemble and majority voting scheme. Public data sets consisting of hundreds of action videos were used in testing. Within the test videos, multiple actors performed various actions including walking, running, jogging, handclapping, boxing, and waving. Performance comparison showed very high classification accuracy for both models with feature-level fusion having an edge. For feature-level fusion the novelty is the fused histogram of visual words derived from different sets of interesting points detected by different saliency detectors. For decision fusion besides Adaboost the majority voting scheme is also utilized in ensemble classifiers based on support vector machines, knearest neighbor, and decision trees. The main contribution, however, is the comparison between the models and, drilling down, the performance of different base classifiers, and different interest point detectors for human motion recognition","PeriodicalId":364589,"journal":{"name":"2012 Third International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT'12)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Third International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT'12)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2012.6477851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Classification of actions by human actors from video enables new technologies in diverse areas such as surveillance and content-based retrieval. We propose and evaluate alternative models, one based on feature-level fusion and the second on decision-level fusion. Both models employ direct classification - inferring from low-level features the nature of the action. Interesting points are assumed to have salient 3D (spatial plus temporal) gradients that distinguish them from their neighborhoods. They are identified using three distinct 3D interesting-point detectors. Each detected interest point set is represented as a bag-of-words descriptor. The feature level fusion model concatenates descriptors subsequently used as input to a classifier. The decision level fusion uses an ensemble and majority voting scheme. Public data sets consisting of hundreds of action videos were used in testing. Within the test videos, multiple actors performed various actions including walking, running, jogging, handclapping, boxing, and waving. Performance comparison showed very high classification accuracy for both models with feature-level fusion having an edge. For feature-level fusion the novelty is the fused histogram of visual words derived from different sets of interesting points detected by different saliency detectors. For decision fusion besides Adaboost the majority voting scheme is also utilized in ensemble classifiers based on support vector machines, knearest neighbor, and decision trees. The main contribution, however, is the comparison between the models and, drilling down, the performance of different base classifiers, and different interest point detectors for human motion recognition
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特征与决策层融合的动作识别
从视频中对人类行为进行分类,可以在监视和基于内容的检索等不同领域实现新技术。我们提出并评估了两种备选模型,一种基于特征级融合,另一种基于决策级融合。这两种模型都采用直接分类——从低级特征推断动作的性质。有趣的点被认为具有显著的3D(空间加时间)梯度,将它们与邻近点区分开来。它们是用三个不同的三维兴趣点探测器来识别的。每个检测到的兴趣点集都表示为词袋描述符。特征级融合模型将随后用作分类器输入的描述符连接起来。决策级融合采用集合和多数投票方案。测试中使用了由数百个动作视频组成的公共数据集。在测试视频中,多位演员表演了各种动作,包括走路、跑步、慢跑、鼓掌、拳击和挥手。性能比较表明,两种具有边缘的特征级融合模型的分类精度都很高。对于特征级融合,新颖性是由不同的显著性检测器检测到的不同兴趣点集合产生的视觉词的融合直方图。对于决策融合,除了Adaboost之外,还在基于支持向量机、最近邻和决策树的集成分类器中使用了多数投票方案。然而,主要的贡献是模型之间的比较,以及向下钻取不同基本分类器和不同兴趣点检测器用于人体运动识别的性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Image analysis system for 96-well plate fluorescence assays Empirical evaluation of image reconstruction techniques Continuous monitoring of heart rate variability and haemodynamic stability of an automobile driver to prevent road accidents Shared aperture printed slot antenna Detecting salient regions in static images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1