Comparison and validation of pressure and acceleration time-domain waveform models of a smart insole for accurate step count in healthy people

Armelle M. Ngueleu, C. Batcho, M. Otis
{"title":"Comparison and validation of pressure and acceleration time-domain waveform models of a smart insole for accurate step count in healthy people","authors":"Armelle M. Ngueleu, C. Batcho, M. Otis","doi":"10.1145/3569192.3569213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have shown good accuracies for step count based on pressure signals of smart insoles in people walking at different speeds. Although smart insoles are often equipped with pressure sensors and accelerometer, no study has focused on comparing the accuracy of step count separately based on pressure and acceleration signals in healthy people. The objectives of this study were to design a waveform model of accelerometer and pressure sensors, and then compare with commercially well-known step count devices and validate these models using manual step counter for step count. Eight healthy participants (age: 39.8±17.56 years old) wore a pair of smart insoles, a GaitUp, and a StepWatchTM and performed the six-minute walking test at walking speeds from 1.62 to 2.22 m/s. Four pressure and one acceleration waveform models were designed and used for the detection of 341 to 412 steps. Accuracies ranged from 99.80%±0.60% to 99.97%±1.38% for right side, and from 99.67%±0.63% to 99.90%±0.05% for left side with pressure waveform models. In addition, the acceleration waveform model provided accuracies of 99.87%±2.49% and 99.84%±4.77% for right and left sides respectively. Step count accuracies using the GaitUp were 99.51%±2.06% for right side, and 99.51%±4.32% for left side. Finally, the StepWatchTM yielded step count accuracies of 99.31%±15.95% and 98.52%±28.06% for right and left sides respectively. These results suggested the smart insole with pressure and acceleration waveform models as more accurate than the StepWatchTM and the GaitUp for step count.","PeriodicalId":249004,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3569192.3569213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have shown good accuracies for step count based on pressure signals of smart insoles in people walking at different speeds. Although smart insoles are often equipped with pressure sensors and accelerometer, no study has focused on comparing the accuracy of step count separately based on pressure and acceleration signals in healthy people. The objectives of this study were to design a waveform model of accelerometer and pressure sensors, and then compare with commercially well-known step count devices and validate these models using manual step counter for step count. Eight healthy participants (age: 39.8±17.56 years old) wore a pair of smart insoles, a GaitUp, and a StepWatchTM and performed the six-minute walking test at walking speeds from 1.62 to 2.22 m/s. Four pressure and one acceleration waveform models were designed and used for the detection of 341 to 412 steps. Accuracies ranged from 99.80%±0.60% to 99.97%±1.38% for right side, and from 99.67%±0.63% to 99.90%±0.05% for left side with pressure waveform models. In addition, the acceleration waveform model provided accuracies of 99.87%±2.49% and 99.84%±4.77% for right and left sides respectively. Step count accuracies using the GaitUp were 99.51%±2.06% for right side, and 99.51%±4.32% for left side. Finally, the StepWatchTM yielded step count accuracies of 99.31%±15.95% and 98.52%±28.06% for right and left sides respectively. These results suggested the smart insole with pressure and acceleration waveform models as more accurate than the StepWatchTM and the GaitUp for step count.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较和验证智能鞋垫的压力和加速度时域波形模型,用于健康人群的准确步数
几项研究表明,基于智能鞋垫的压力信号,人们以不同的速度行走,步数的准确性很高。虽然智能鞋垫通常配备压力传感器和加速度计,但目前还没有研究集中在比较健康人基于压力和加速度信号的步数的准确性。本研究的目的是设计加速度计和压力传感器的波形模型,然后与商业上知名的步长计数设备进行比较,并使用手动步长计数器进行步长计数验证这些模型。8名健康参与者(年龄:39.8±17.56岁)穿着一双智能鞋垫、GaitUp和StepWatchTM,在1.62至2.22米/秒的步行速度下进行了6分钟的步行测试。设计了4种压力波形模型和1种加速度波形模型,分别用于341 ~ 412步的检测。右侧压力波形模型的准确率为99.80%±0.60% ~ 99.97%±1.38%,左侧压力波形模型的准确率为99.67%±0.63% ~ 99.90%±0.05%。此外,该模型对左右两侧加速度波形的精度分别为99.87%±2.49%和99.84%±4.77%。使用GaitUp进行右侧步长计数准确率为99.51%±2.06%,左侧步长计数准确率为99.51%±4.32%。最后,StepWatchTM对右侧和左侧的步长计数准确率分别为99.31%±15.95%和98.52%±28.06%。这些结果表明,具有压力和加速度波形模型的智能鞋垫比StepWatchTM和GaitUp更准确地计算步数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exergy and exergy cost analysis of biochemical networks in living systems far from equilibrium Success stories of triterpenoid-based hybrid molecules as new promising anticancer agents: Triterpenoid-driven analogs Data and task orchestration defined by spatio-temporal variables for healthcare data science services Stenosis Detection in X-ray Coronary Angiography with Deep Neural Networks Leveraged by Attention Mechanisms In silico Investigation of Immulina Glycosidic Residues as Immunostimulants by Targeting Penaeus monodon Shrimp Toll-Receptor 9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1