Unjust Enrichment in Australia 2014

K. Barker, H. Tait
{"title":"Unjust Enrichment in Australia 2014","authors":"K. Barker, H. Tait","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3891934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A digest, summary and commentary upon Australian caselaw developments on the law of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution in the year 2014. Includes analysis of the critical High Court decisions in Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty v Hills [2014] HCA 14 (recognising for the first time a defence of change of position in Australian law); Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 15.(on liquidators' liens) and Lavin v Toppi (on co-surety contribution rights). Also considers Edelman J's influential decision in Lampson v Fortesque Metals Group Ltd (No 3) [2014] WASC 162.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A digest, summary and commentary upon Australian caselaw developments on the law of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution in the year 2014. Includes analysis of the critical High Court decisions in Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty v Hills [2014] HCA 14 (recognising for the first time a defence of change of position in Australian law); Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 15.(on liquidators' liens) and Lavin v Toppi (on co-surety contribution rights). Also considers Edelman J's influential decision in Lampson v Fortesque Metals Group Ltd (No 3) [2014] WASC 162.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014年澳大利亚不当得利案
摘要、总结和评论2014年澳大利亚关于不当得利和赔偿法的判例法发展。包括对澳大利亚金融服务和租赁公司诉希尔斯案[2014]HCA 14中的关键高等法院判决的分析(首次承认澳大利亚法律中立场变化的辩护);Stewart诉Atco Controls Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 15。(关于清算人留置权)和Lavin诉Toppi(关于共同担保出资权)。还考虑了Edelman J在Lampson v Fortesque Metals Group Ltd (No . 3) [2014] WASC 162的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La garantía legal del Estatuto del Consumidor como mecanismo para proteger al comprador frente a vicios inmobiliarios progresivos (The Legal Guarantee of the Consumers Statute as a Mechanism to Protect Buyer Front of Progressive Real Estate Vices) Solidarismo y contratos relacionales: alternativas frente a la pandemia de covid-19 (Contractual Solidarism and Relational Contract Theory: Alternative Approaches to Contract Law in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic) Error Correction Mechanisms for Transactional Script Smart Contracts The Shadows of Litigation Finance Malas leyes (Bad Law)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1