Path Analysis of Critical Thinking Effect on Self-Efficiency Among Nursing and Medical Students

Omid Khosravizadeh, B. Ahadinezhad, Aisa Maleki, A. Hashtroodi, P. Vosoughi, Shahrzad Kohan
{"title":"Path Analysis of Critical Thinking Effect on Self-Efficiency Among Nursing and Medical Students","authors":"Omid Khosravizadeh, B. Ahadinezhad, Aisa Maleki, A. Hashtroodi, P. Vosoughi, Shahrzad Kohan","doi":"10.18502/jebhpme.v6i4.11536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Critical thinking is the ability to ask appropriate questions and gather relevant information. It enables rational judgment and problem-solving for physicians and nurses. For the first time, this study examined two major groups of caregivers at the patient's bedside in terms of the relationship between critical thinking and self-efficacy. \nMethods: This was a descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2021. The sample was taken from Qazvin university of medical sciences’(QUM’s) nursing and medical students through stratified random method. It was performed using structural equation method (n=377). Data collection tools included: demographic information, Ricketts critical thinking questionnaire, and GSE-17 questionnaire. Finally, data were analyzed through the correlation coefficient and multiple regression tests using SPSS22 software at a significance level of 0.05. \nResults: Results indicated that the model established at this step demonstrates good fitness. In this model χ2 = 1919.91, df = 89, χ2 / df = 2.14, RMSEA = 0.05, NFI = 0.63, GFI = 0. 77 and CFI = 0. 76.   The structural equation model's standard estimation coefficients show that all the existing paths are at a significant level (CTH: CRV 0.96, CTH: COM 0.94, CTH: SFE -0.61; P-value< 0.05). Finally, the regression analysis showed an inverse effect of critical thinking on self – efficacy. \nConclusion: The study showed that critical thinking had a direct effect on self-efficacy. In addition, these two features have a significant effect on increasing the efficiency and making the right clinical decisions in medical and nursing groups. Therefore, upgrading these skills by updating curriculum will ultimately improve healthcare outcomes provided by these two specific groups.","PeriodicalId":198049,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jebhpme.v6i4.11536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critical thinking is the ability to ask appropriate questions and gather relevant information. It enables rational judgment and problem-solving for physicians and nurses. For the first time, this study examined two major groups of caregivers at the patient's bedside in terms of the relationship between critical thinking and self-efficacy. Methods: This was a descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2021. The sample was taken from Qazvin university of medical sciences’(QUM’s) nursing and medical students through stratified random method. It was performed using structural equation method (n=377). Data collection tools included: demographic information, Ricketts critical thinking questionnaire, and GSE-17 questionnaire. Finally, data were analyzed through the correlation coefficient and multiple regression tests using SPSS22 software at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Results indicated that the model established at this step demonstrates good fitness. In this model χ2 = 1919.91, df = 89, χ2 / df = 2.14, RMSEA = 0.05, NFI = 0.63, GFI = 0. 77 and CFI = 0. 76.   The structural equation model's standard estimation coefficients show that all the existing paths are at a significant level (CTH: CRV 0.96, CTH: COM 0.94, CTH: SFE -0.61; P-value< 0.05). Finally, the regression analysis showed an inverse effect of critical thinking on self – efficacy. Conclusion: The study showed that critical thinking had a direct effect on self-efficacy. In addition, these two features have a significant effect on increasing the efficiency and making the right clinical decisions in medical and nursing groups. Therefore, upgrading these skills by updating curriculum will ultimately improve healthcare outcomes provided by these two specific groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判性思维对护医学生自我效能的影响路径分析
背景:批判性思维是提出适当问题和收集相关信息的能力。它使医生和护士能够理性判断和解决问题。本研究首次就批判性思维与自我效能之间的关系对患者床边的两组主要护理人员进行了调查。方法:这是一项于2021年进行的描述性分析和横断面研究。采用分层随机抽样的方法,从卡兹温医科大学的护理和医学生中抽取样本。采用结构方程法(n=377)。数据收集工具包括:人口统计信息、Ricketts批判性思维问卷、GSE-17问卷。最后,采用SPSS22软件对数据进行相关系数和多元回归检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:该步骤建立的模型具有良好的适应度。在该模型中,χ2 = 1919.91, df = 89, χ2 / df = 2.14, RMSEA = 0.05, NFI = 0.63, GFI = 0。77, CFI = 0。76年。结构方程模型的标准估计系数表明,现有路径均处于显著水平(CTH: CRV 0.96, CTH: COM 0.94, CTH: SFE -0.61;假定值< 0.05)。最后,回归分析显示批判性思维对自我效能感有负相关的影响。结论:批判性思维对自我效能感有直接影响。此外,这两个特点对提高医疗护理团队的工作效率和做出正确的临床决策有显著的作用。因此,通过更新课程来提升这些技能将最终改善这两个特定群体提供的医疗保健结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring and Comparing Service Delivery Time in Government and Outsourced Health Posts Affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Virtual Reality Interventions on Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review Institutional Ownership and Concentration of Capital in Pharmaceutical Companies: Evidence from Iran Factors Affecting the Resilience of Nurses in the COVID-19 Crisis: A Mixed Method Study from West of Iran Disaster Mitigation and preparedness from the Perspective of Holy Quran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1