A comparative study of linear encoding in Genetic Programming

Yuttana Suttasupa, Suppat Rungraungsilp, Suwat Pinyopan, Pravit Wungchusunti, P. Chongstitvatana
{"title":"A comparative study of linear encoding in Genetic Programming","authors":"Yuttana Suttasupa, Suppat Rungraungsilp, Suwat Pinyopan, Pravit Wungchusunti, P. Chongstitvatana","doi":"10.1109/ICTKE.2012.6152392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genetic Programming is a widely used technique to solve many optimization problems. The original representation of a solution is a tree structure. To improve its search capability there are many proposals for encoding data structure of a solution of Genetic Programming as a linear code. However there are a few work in comparing between these proposals. This work presents a systematic way to compare three popular techniques for linear encoding in Genetic Programming. They are Linear Genetic Programming, Gene Expression Programming and Multi-Expression Programming. Ten problems in Symbolic Expressions are defined and are used as benchmarks to compare the effectiveness of these proposals against the baseline standard Genetic Programming. The metrics of comparison are the Success Rate and the absolute error. The discussion and comparison of the strength and weakness of each method are also presented.","PeriodicalId":235347,"journal":{"name":"2011 Ninth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Ninth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTKE.2012.6152392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Genetic Programming is a widely used technique to solve many optimization problems. The original representation of a solution is a tree structure. To improve its search capability there are many proposals for encoding data structure of a solution of Genetic Programming as a linear code. However there are a few work in comparing between these proposals. This work presents a systematic way to compare three popular techniques for linear encoding in Genetic Programming. They are Linear Genetic Programming, Gene Expression Programming and Multi-Expression Programming. Ten problems in Symbolic Expressions are defined and are used as benchmarks to compare the effectiveness of these proposals against the baseline standard Genetic Programming. The metrics of comparison are the Success Rate and the absolute error. The discussion and comparison of the strength and weakness of each method are also presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传规划中线性编码的比较研究
遗传规划是一种广泛应用于解决许多优化问题的技术。解决方案的原始表示是树结构。为了提高遗传规划解的搜索能力,有许多方法将遗传规划解的数据结构编码为线性编码。然而,在这些建议之间进行比较还需要做一些工作。这项工作提出了一种系统的方法来比较遗传规划中三种流行的线性编码技术。它们是线性遗传规划、基因表达式规划和多表达式规划。定义了符号表达式中的10个问题,并将其作为基准,将这些建议与基准遗传规划的有效性进行比较。比较的指标是成功率和绝对误差。并对各种方法的优缺点进行了讨论和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of object detection software for a mobile robot using an AForce.Net framework Hybrid parallel approach based on wavelet transformation and principle component analysis for solving face recognition problem Developing an influence diagram using a Structural Modeling, Inference, and Learning Engine A mixed integer non-linear programming model for optimizing the collection methods of returned products Towards a data warehouse testing framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1