Inclusion, sustainability, and equality: how can research contribute?

A. Härenstam
{"title":"Inclusion, sustainability, and equality: how can research contribute?","authors":"A. Härenstam","doi":"10.1080/20021518.2017.1332856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Polarisation, segregation, exclusion, inequality, and vulnerability are real threats to our societies. What kind of research can identify and explain the mechanisms involved in creating what we need to strive for integration, inclusion, equality, and social sustainability? What kind of questions shall we raise? How can we decrease the gap between research and practice? In fact, striving to keep to the standards of excellent science might result in missing important aspects and new perspectives. There is a risk that within disciplines, science is too abstract and narrow-minded. My intention here is to share some reflections on how we can learn from earlier experiences of research on inequalities and to discuss some alternative ideas on approaches that might contribute applicable knowledge.","PeriodicalId":254363,"journal":{"name":"Society, Health & Vulnerability","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society, Health & Vulnerability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20021518.2017.1332856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Polarisation, segregation, exclusion, inequality, and vulnerability are real threats to our societies. What kind of research can identify and explain the mechanisms involved in creating what we need to strive for integration, inclusion, equality, and social sustainability? What kind of questions shall we raise? How can we decrease the gap between research and practice? In fact, striving to keep to the standards of excellent science might result in missing important aspects and new perspectives. There is a risk that within disciplines, science is too abstract and narrow-minded. My intention here is to share some reflections on how we can learn from earlier experiences of research on inequalities and to discuss some alternative ideas on approaches that might contribute applicable knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包容、可持续性和平等:研究如何做出贡献?
两极分化、隔离、排斥、不平等和脆弱性是对我们社会的真正威胁。什么样的研究可以识别和解释创造我们需要努力实现整合、包容、平等和社会可持续性的机制?我们应该提出什么样的问题呢?我们如何缩小研究与实践之间的差距?事实上,努力保持优秀科学的标准可能会导致错过重要的方面和新的视角。有一种风险是,在学科内部,科学过于抽象和狭隘。我在这里的目的是分享一些关于我们如何从早期研究不平等的经验中学习的思考,并讨论一些可能有助于提供适用知识的方法的替代想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dimensions of vulnerability salient for health: a sociological approach “Does training in Motivational Interviewing affect the ability to build working alliance? – an intervention study” Promoting professional development in medical education: perspectives from the Norwegian medical school in Tromsoe Co-worker dialogue – a tool for health, personal development, and an empowering development culture in the workplace Relationships between healthcare employees and managers as a resource for well-being at work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1